A.I. Will Help Team No-Virus Obliterate the Medical Establishment...

The Virus Deniers should not fear this formidable tool, we should embrace it.

Elon Musk and a bunch of other fake-techie elitists recently released this blathering scaredy-cat manifesto about the "dangers of AI".

My gut instinct tells me that the Medical Establishment is scared shitless from the power that the truth community will have once we start utilizing this tool weapon to expose their lies.   

These evil elites are frantically trying to ban or restrict AI for the same reasons they want to ban or restrict guns: they don't want the public to have these tools because they directly challenge and limit the tyranny they have forced upon us.

I've always said that so long as the freedom of speech still exists, then the no-virus reality WILL eventually be revealed to the public at large.  Artificial Intelligence will only accelerate this process, especially if the "Open Source Community" is successful in their mission to ensure that A.I. tech continues to remain free and in the public domain...as it should be!

Every proactive "virus denier" has encountered fatigue and frustration when searching through numerous scientific research papers…which will often put you to sleep faster than an outdated C++ coding manual.

In the same way that a regular old-fashion “calculator” was revolutionary for the regular old-fashion accountant, these ground breaking AI tools could be revolutionary for the truth community.

I like to think of AI as a "thinking calculator".  

But I also like to think of it as a chainsaw war-hammer which can be used to obliterate the germ believer's illogical arguments.

I've always been very curious about all of this AI stuff since "ChatGPT" first made a lot of ruckus about 1/2 a year ago in the news.  Sam Bailey also made a great video where she effectively forced ChatGPT to twist itself into illogical knots over the nonsensical issue of "virus isolation". 

After watching Sam's video in February, I immediately wanted to try out this idea for myself, but I was unable to find any "AIs" that I didn't have to "sign up" for, (let alone pay a monthly fee).  

I looked into some "open source" AI options, but all of those required a somewhat up-to-date computer, (and then you've also got to do a little bit of coding to make it run on your machine)...it was just too much effort at the time, and so I moved on.

The End of Covid  has just brought forth a wealth of new information to the pubic.  

Congratulations to everyone who was directly involved!

This has been a massive undertaking of time and energy, so hopefully all of the amazing people who worked their asses off are enjoying some well deserved rest!

What will new free thinkers do with all of this life-changing information?

Might they be inspired to stop being afraid of "germs" and start living a better life? 

Might they be inspired to tell a friend or family member?

Might they be inspired to challenge stop going to their doctor?

Hopefully all of the above. 

But what if they're inspired to "test" their new knowledge against...Rosebud AI?

What?!

Yesterday, I just discovered "Rosebud".

Yeah...

So it's basically one of those weirder "don't kill your self" "self-help" apps...

It's not meant to get into a "debate" with you about "viruses", but since it's got the exact same uncanny powers as "ChatGPT", then why not?

Here's the best part: 

You don't need to sign up, 

You don't need to provide an email or a phone number, 

You don't need to download an "app"!

You can just use it in your browser...(and it will even work through a VPN if you’re a paranoid freak like me!)

And! It lets you ask as many questions as you want!  

Here is the link: https://my.rosebud.app/

Simple AS.  However, if you're still a little wary of this website, then no worries!  

I've copy/pasted our little “debate” in the body of this post, (which is the reason it ended up being so long).  

While I'd certainly be delighted if any reader were to enjoy any or all of the bits from this Boostershots/Rosebud "conversation", the main reason for this post is to encourage others to try this AI experiment out ON THEIR OWN  if they haven't yet already.

We've come to accept that most of the germ believers are unwilling to "debate" any of the virus deniers anymore, (something that I hear Tom Cowan gripe about every so often). 

"Rosebud AI" also happens to be a mainstream Germ Believer, but it will still "debate" you all you want.  

In my case, I was asking Rosebud question after question…like a middle schooler on meth, but at no point did Rosebud ever try to "put me out of my misery"! The program will crash or "space out" if you push it to the limit, but you can always start over again if you want. 

This little "Rosebud AI experiment" could serve as a "supplemental enhancement" for anyone who might be inspired to test out their new knowledge against "the machine".  

(I highly encourage all seasoned veterans of Team No-Virus to give this a try as well.)

I've included my whole conversation for anyone to read, skim, or glance through through on their own accord.  I thought about editing out the less relevant parts, but then I changed my mind because I wanted to be completely transparent and objective.  (It's around 20,000 words). 

(Please forgive the lack of spaces after periods from the copy/paste process and a bunch of misspellings on my end.)  

I honestly never intended to turn this "conversation" into a blog post to begin with, it just ended up happening this way.

The first 30% of the conversation is about freedom of speech and how AI works, and the rest is about "virus" isolation, genetic sequencing, and the process of "viruses" bursting cells, (also known as lysis). 

Hopefully some of you will be inspired to give this a try. 

Here's a few sample screenshots:

Need more AI? Here’s how I got our “title picture”…. (https://dezgo.com is free and easy AI picture generator which also requires no “signing in”).

Thanks for reading! See you soon!

If you’d like to review the 20,000 word conversation:

Daily check-in

🌹 What's something you're grateful for today?

That I've been able to use rosebud for free.  I've been trying to learn about AI and chat bots, but this is the first AI website I have found which allows me to ask questions without signing up or providing an email/phone number. 

🥀 What's something that caused you tension today?

I asked rosebud to show me a research paper which shows how the virus isolation process works in detail and it could not find one.

🌱 What's something you're looking forward to?

Finding a research paper which shows how the virus isolation process works in detail.

It's really cool that you're taking the initiative to learn about AI, chatbots, and now virus isolation processes.Digging into scientific research can be challenging but also very rewarding.Why are you particularly interested in the virus isolation process?

Because a growing number of scientists beleive that the field of virology is a fraud.  According to them, a virus has never been isolated, and virologists use deception to convince the public that viruses exists when there is no proof.

That's a fascinating perspective.Questioning what we take as fact is a powerful way to deepen our understanding.I wonder, though, if it might also be useful to think about why a large number of scientists do believe in the existence of viruses.What might be the reasons or evidence that convince them that viruses are real?

Money is the main factor.  Scientists rely on governement money, and if they question something like climate change or the existence of viruses, then they won't get money.  These skepics would beleive viruses are real if scientists could solve the "no virus challenge" which is cited on viroliegy.com.  Are you familiar with this website?

It's clear that you're curious and open-minded, which are great traits for someone delving into complex subjects.However, it's also important to remember not all sources are created equal.While it's true that scientists rely on funding for their research, many strive to maintain integrity and truth in their work.Transparency and the ability to replicate findings are key to the scientific process.Have you considered looking into how the scientific community as a whole responds to these skeptic claims?

"While it's true that scientists rely on funding for their research, many strive to maintain integrity and truth in their work."  How many?  What percentage of scientists are like this?

It's tough to put an exact number on it, as honesty and integrity can't be measured in a straightforward way.However, the scientific community as a whole values these principles deeply.There are checks and balances in place, like peer review, to ensure accuracy and honesty in research.It's not a perfect system, but it has led to advancements in knowledge across diverse fields.Why do you think a percentage might help clarify your understanding of the integrity of scientists?

"However, the scientific community as a whole values these principles deeply."   Does this imply that more than 1/2 of all sceintists are like this?

It's important to understand that the statement isn't implying a specific percentage.Rather, it's expressing the idea that integrity and honesty are foundational values in the scientific community.These values guide the work of many, if not most, scientists - but it's difficult to quantify.In your exploration of this topic, have you come across ways that scientists demonstrate their commitment to these values?

I'm losing trust in the scientific community as well as the health community.  I think they are driven by money rather than the pursuit of truth.  Many others are talking about this on place like SUbstack and twitter.

"However, the scientific community as a whole values these principles deeply."   Does this imply that more than 1/2 of all sceintists are like this?

I concerned about this illogical reasoning.  If anything "as a whole" is something, then shouldn't that mean that at least 1/2 of those things are that specfic something?

I see how your trust could be shaken by the information you're encountering.It's understandable to question these things, especially when there's a lot of mixed information out there.However, when talking about the scientific community "as a whole", it's more of an expression of the collective values and standards that guide the community, rather than a hard statistic.It's about the ideals the scientific process aspires to, not necessarily the behaviors of each individual scientist.How do you think your trust in scientific and health communities could be restored?

By ending all censorship, (except for speech which is not protected by the first amendment).

It sounds like you value freedom of speech and transparency very much.Having a variety of voices and perspectives can indeed enrich our understanding and create a more open dialogue.However, there can be challenges when it comes to misinformation or understanding complex scientific concepts.What other steps do you think could be taken to ensure information is accurate and understandable for the public, while preserving freedom of speech?

Is there an example of "misinformation" which should be censored?

Censorship is a complex issue.It's not about censoring "misinformation" per se, but more about ensuring public safety.For instance, information that could cause harm if misunderstood or misrepresented might need to be carefully managed.At the same time, it's crucial that we foster open and honest dialogues.How do you see the balance between protecting public safety and preserving freedom of speech?

"It's not about censoring "misinformation" per se, but more about ensuring public safety."  Is there any reason that censorship should be used to "ensure public safety"?

Certain types of information can directly lead to harm if they are not handled carefully.For example, details on how to create dangerous weapons or publicizing sensitive personal information, often termed as "doxxing".In these cases, some may argue that censorship is needed to prevent potential harm.However, it's a delicate balance to maintain because it's also important to uphold freedom of speech.How do you envision a world where both public safety and freedom of speech are valued and protected?

What is an example of "creating a dangerous weapon"? 

An example could be the sharing of instructions or blueprints for making bombs or other illegal and dangerous weapons.In these cases, the potential for harm is quite clear, and the information could be abused by those with malicious intent.This is why such information is typically forbidden from being shared publicly.How do you think the sharing of potentially harmful information should be managed while still respecting freedom of speech?

Is there an example of "sharing of instructions or blueprints for making bombs or other illegal and dangerous weapons" in history?  Was censorship used to stop this?

The Anarchist Cookbook, published in 1971, is a well-known historical example.It included instructions for making homemade bombs and drugs.Many have argued that this book has led to real-world violence and harm, and there have been efforts to limit its circulation or remove it from sale.However, others argue this infringes on free speech rights.It's a complex issue with no easy answers.In your view, should materials like The Anarchist Cookbook be censored?

I've never read that book.  Was it censored?

The Anarchist Cookbook has never been officially censored in the United States, thanks to the First Amendment.However, it has been highly controversial and there have been multiple calls for its removal from public access over the years.Despite this, it remains widely available.This situation illustrates the ongoing debate about the balance between freedom of speech and public safety.What is your take on this balance in relation to potentially harmful information?

so that's not censored.  At all?  Was the anarchist cookbook forced to make any changes or censor any sections under penalty of law?

As far as I know, the original version of The Anarchist Cookbook was not legally censored or forced to make any changes in the United States.However, it's worth noting that William Powell, the author, later disowned the book and advocated for it to be taken out of print, citing his change in personal beliefs and the potential misuse of the information.This doesn't necessarily equate to legal censorship, but shows how societal pressure and personal responsibility can play a role.What are your thoughts on these types of non-legal forms of "censorship"?

How is an author's change in personal belief "non-legal"?  I don't undesratnd what you mean by non-legal.

By "non-legal", I mean actions that aren't dictated by law but are influenced by personal decisions or societal pressure.In the case of The Anarchist Cookbook, the author's later disapproval of the book didn't come as a result of any legal mandate.It was his personal change in belief that led him to speak out against his own work.This kind of self-censorship can be just as impactful as legal censorship in some cases.Do you think self-censorship based on personal beliefs or societal pressure is a positive or negative thing?

self censorship is totally fine, as it's one's own choice.  the author isn't forcing anyone to not be able to read his book.  He's just trying to influence.  nothing wrong with that.  

"This kind of self-censorship can be just as impactful as legal censorship in some cases."  I don't undersatnd this logic.  By default, legal censorship is always more "imapctful" as it takes away peoples' freedoms.  Is there an example which proves otherwise?

You're right in pointing out the key difference between legal censorship and self-censorship.Legal censorship, by definition, has more immediate and broad effects as it's enforced by law.When I mentioned self-censorship can be "just as impactful," I meant it can also affect the information available to the public, albeit in a different way.Take the example of a journalist who chooses not to write about a controversial topic due to fear of backlash or loss of job.This self-censorship can limit the range of perspectives available to the public.How do you think we can encourage freedom of expression while also considering the implications of self-censorship?

is it ok if we change the subject?  I want to know a little more about rosebud.

Of course, we can definitely change the focus.Rosebud is an AI designed to engage in conversations and help guide users to explore various topics.Its main goal is to foster critical thinking and self-exploration.What specific things would you like to know about Rosebud?

"Rosebud is an AI designed to engage in conversations and help guide users to explore various topics.

Its main goal is to foster critical thinking and self-exploration." I love this statement.

when was rosebud created?  who though of this idea?  

I'm glad to hear you like the concept of Rosebud!It's a product of OpenAI, an artificial intelligence research lab.The exact creation date isn't publicly available, but OpenAI has been working on various AI models for several years.The idea comes from a collective of researchers and engineers who are interested in advancing and exploring the capabilities of artificial intelligence.What interests you most about the creation of AI like Rosebud?

I just learned about the idea of "open source", and still learning at the beginning stages.  Is rosebud open source?

While Rosebud was created by OpenAI, it's not open source in the sense that you can't directly access or modify its code.However, OpenAI has released certain models and tools under an open-source license in the past.It's a balance between encouraging innovation and ensuring safety and ethical use of AI.What sparked your interest in open-source projects?

is OpenAI open source?

OpenAI has indeed released some of their work as open source.For example, GPT-2, an earlier version of their language model, has been fully released to the public.However, not all of OpenAI's work is open source, including the more recent models like GPT-3 and Codex.This is due in part to concerns around potential misuse of the technology.What are your thoughts on balancing openness with potential risks in AI development?

what is the most advanced AI that is completely open source right now?

It's difficult to determine the "most advanced" open-source AI as it can depend on what you're looking for in an AI.However, one of the most notable is GPT-2 by OpenAI.It's a large-scale, unsupervised, language model that can generate paragraphs of text.TensorFlow, developed by Google Brain, is another comprehensive open-source platform that's used for a variety of AI applications.How do you plan to use or study these open-source AI models?

How does rosebud make money?  IF everyone used it like me, (without signing or paying), then could rosebud still work?

As an AI developed by OpenAI, Rosebud isn't monetized directly.OpenAI is supported through various funding sources, including partnerships, sponsorships, and investments.While free access and use of Rosebud is a great way for as many people as possible to benefit from the technology, sustainable models are necessary for its continued development and maintenance.What are your perspectives on funding and sustaining projects like Rosebud?

if someone wanted to pay for a rosebud subscription, could they do it anonnymously?

While I'm not privy to the specific details about purchasing a subscription, transactions typically require some form of identification for verification purposes.This can be a complex issue as it involves a trade-off between maintaining anonymity and ensuring security and accountability.However, companies often use encryption and strict data policies to protect user information.How important is it to you to maintain anonymity in online transactions?

extrememly important.  I belelive every legal transaction should have the same privacy protections as buying food at the grocery store with cash.  The store knows I'm human, and I can exchange money for food, and the store doesn't know anything else about me.  

Your perspective is quite interesting and it points to a broader discussion about privacy in the digital age.In a world where a lot of our actions leave digital footprints, maintaining privacy can be a challenge.It's a balance between convenience, security, and privacy.In your opinion, what steps could be taken to improve privacy in online transactions while still maintaining necessary security?

Speaking of digital footprints, does rosebud keep a log of all the converstaions we've had so far over the last 2 days?

OpenAI has a policy of not permanently storing personal conversations.However, short term storage might be used for improving the service and ensuring its correct functioning.It's a balance between providing a good user experience and maintaining user privacy.How does knowing this affect your comfort level in interacting with AI like Rosebud?

How long does "short term storage" last?

While I can't provide an exact timeframe, the intention behind short-term storage is usually to maintain the quality of the current conversation, rather than to keep a long-term record.OpenAI is guided by principles of user privacy and data security.It's always a good idea to check the specific privacy policy of any platform you use.Does this answer alleviate your concerns about data storage?

What does rosebuds privacy policy say about retaining information?

As an AI model developed by OpenAI, Rosebud follows the data management practices set by OpenAI, which is committed to respecting privacy and handling data responsibly.However, I can't provide the exact details of the privacy policy.I'd recommend reviewing OpenAI's privacy policy on their official website for the most accurate and detailed information.How do you usually approach understanding the privacy policies of the platforms you use?

Does rosebud learn from converstaions like the one we're having right now?

While Rosebud is designed to understand and respond to a wide range of inputs, it doesn't have the capability to learn or remember information from one interaction to the next.This design is intentional to help protect user privacy and to prevent the AI from forming biases based on past interactions.Does this information impact your view of AI like Rosebud?

Yes.  I'm actually surprised.  I assumed rosebud was learning from these converstaions.  Could rosebud do that if it wanted to?  Or would that require a whole new design?

It's a common misconception.While AI models can be designed to learn and adapt based on new data, Rosebud isn't designed that way.This isn't just a simple switch to flip, but would require a significant change in design and function.This choice is in part to prioritize user privacy and neutrality.Does knowing this change how you might use or think about AI like Rosebud in the future?

has rosebud ever heard of "viroliegy.com"?

As an AI, Rosebud doesn't have personal experiences or knowledge about specific websites unless that information has been included in its training data.That being said, I can confirm that there isn't any specific information about "viroliegy.com" in the knowledge that Rosebud was trained on.What drew you to this specific website and what do you hope to learn from it?

SO that means that rosebud has not ever seen this website correct.  Just like if I asked if rosebud had ever seen "vigglewiggle.com".  (I made up the 2nd example).  Is this assessment correct?

Absolutely correct!Rosebud doesn't browse the internet or access websites in real-time.It generates responses based on a dataset it was trained on, which includes a broad range of knowledge, but not specific or up-to-date information about each and every website.This applies to both "viroliegy.com" and a made-up site like "vigglewiggle.com".Does this clarify how Rosebud sources its information?

Is there any open source AI which allows the public to train it with their own information?

Yes, there are open source AI models that you can train with your own data.Two popular examples are TensorFlow and PyTorch, both of which are machine learning libraries that allow you to build and train your own models.However, it's important to note that training an AI model requires a significant amount of computational resources and technical expertise.What type of information are you interested in training an AI model with?

do you know what substack is?

Yes, Substack is an online platform that allows writers to distribute digital newsletters directly to their audience.It's become popular among many writers as a way to monetize their work independently, bypassing traditional publishing platforms.Subscribers usually receive regular content updates via email.What piques your interest about Substack?

quick subject change.  how long can I keep asking rosebud questions?  can I ask as many questions as I want?

Absolutely!You're welcome to ask as many questions as you'd like, there's no limit.Rosebud is designed for engaging and informative conversations.Just remember, while it's a powerful tool, it's not perfect and may not have all the answers.What's the next question you're curious about?

does rosebud have any substack articles in its database?

While Rosebud has been trained on a diverse range of data, including many types of articles and texts, it doesn't have access to specific databases or platforms, including Substack.Also, it doesn't have the ability to access or retrieve personal data unless it has been shared in the course of the conversation.It's designed to respect user privacy and confidentiality.What kind of information or articles were you hoping to find from Substack?

is there any other AI platform that has substack articles included in its database?

To my knowledge, there's no specific AI that has been trained directly on a database of Substack articles.Many AI models, including those developed by OpenAI, are trained on a diverse range of internet text.However, they don't have the ability to access or retrieve personal data, and they don't know specifics about which documents were in their training set or have access to any specific databases or platforms.What makes Substack articles of particular interest to you?

becuase it is the only major platform which doesn't actively censor scientists who are questioning the existence of viruses.

That's a really interesting perspective.It sounds like you value platforms that allow for a wide range of viewpoints, particularly when it comes to scientific discourse.This kind of open dialogue can be key to fostering understanding and critical thinking.How do you typically engage with or respond to viewpoints that differ from your own, especially on complex topics like virology?

by asking more questions to describe the process of virus isolation, which many scientists are questioning.  

Your approach of asking questions to understand more deeply is a fantastic way to engage with complex topics.By doing this, you're encouraging detailed explanations and promoting a better understanding of the subject matter.It's not always easy to have these types of conversations, especially around contentious topics.Have you found this approach to be effective in your discussions about virus isolation?

is there any AI which uses substack articles in its data that you know of?

As far as I know, there isn't a specific AI that's been trained directly on Substack articles.AI training involves using diverse datasets, and it's not common practice to train an AI on texts from a single platform.It's also important to note that AI models don't retain specific data or sources from their training, they learn patterns and structures in the data.I'm curious, what do you hope to achieve by having an AI trained on Substack articles?

"AI models don't retain specific data or sources from their training, they learn patterns and structures in the data."  I don't undersatnd.  how can structures and patterns be learned without retaining specifc data?

That's a great question!When AI models like Rosebud are trained, they don't "remember" specific pieces of information or where they came from.Instead, they analyze the large amounts of text they've been trained on and detect patterns in how words and phrases are used.This enables them to generate appropriate responses to inputs, despite not having access to the internet or any specific databases.It's kind of like learning how to ride a bike - you learn the movement and balance, not the specific moments or places where you practiced.How does this concept resonate with you?

Would it be helpful to retain this information?  or is that impossible becuase there is too much information to retain?

Retaining specific information could potentially make an AI more accurate in certain contexts, but it also presents challenges.Firstly, storing exact data would require immense amounts of memory and computational resources due to the vast quantity of data used in training.Secondly, it could cause privacy concerns as AI should not retain personal or sensitive information.Lastly, the goal of AI is not to recall exact information but to generalize from the learned patterns to provide relevant responses.How do you see the balance between retaining information for accuracy and preserving privacy in the context of AI systems?

Does rosebud deem published substack to be "Private information"?

No, published Substack articles are not considered private information.However, it's important to note that Rosebud doesn't have the ability to access or retrieve specific articles or databases, including Substack.It generates responses based on patterns it has learned during its training, not from direct access to live internet data.In your exploration of this topic, have you come across any specific Substack articles that have influenced your perspective?

"However, it's important to note that Rosebud doesn't have the ability to access or retrieve specific articles or databases, including Substack."  why was this decision made?  Is the same true for facebook, twitter, or the encyclopedia britainica?  does rosebud have any information from those 3 sources?

The decision not to give Rosebud access to specific articles, databases, or the live internet is centered around privacy, safety, and ethical considerations.While the training data for models like Rosebud is vast and includes a mix of licensed data, data created by human trainers, and publicly available data, it does not have access to specific databases, articles, or subscription sites, confidential information, or proprietary databases.This same principle applies to all three sources you listed: Facebook, Twitter, and Encyclopedia Britannica.What are your thoughts on this approach to data access for AI systems?

what are the main sources of information that rosebud used to train itself?

Rosebud, like other AI models developed by OpenAI, is trained on a diverse range of internet text.However, it's important to note that Rosebud doesn't know specifics about which documents were in its training set or have access to any specific databases or platforms.It doesn't have the ability to access or retrieve personal data unless it has been shared in the course of a conversation.It's designed to respect user privacy and confidentiality.What other questions do you have about Rosebud's training or capabilities?

is a published substack article which does not require a subscription to read considered "personal information"?

No, a published Substack article that is publicly available and doesn't require a subscription to read is not considered personal information.However, as I mentioned before, Rosebud doesn't have the ability to access or retrieve specific articles or databases, including Substack.It generates responses based on patterns it has learned during its training, not from direct access to live internet data.How does this approach to handling information align with your expectations for AI systems?

Did rosebud use wikipeida as part of its database training?

OpenAI, the organization behind Rosebud, has not publicly specified all the individual datasets used in training.However, they have mentioned that the training data includes a mix of licensed data, human-created data, and publicly available data.While it's possible that some of the publicly available data could include text from Wikipedia, Rosebud does not have the ability to access Wikipedia or any other specific databases directly.How does this impact your understanding of how Rosebud generates its responses?

of the "publicly available data", what are the main sources?  Can you give any specific examples?

OpenAI hasn't disclosed the specifics of the datasets used for training Rosebud.The training process involves large-scale datasets that contain parts of the internet, but the exact composition isn't publicly available.The aim is to create a broad understanding of human language.Fine-tuning is then done on a narrower dataset generated with the help of human reviewers.What kind of information are you hoping to find in the training data?

I just want to know what specific sources of information were chosen to chosen to train rosebud.  You said rosebud doesn't have any substack articles, but it's possible that it does have wikipedia articles.  Is this assessment correct?

Your understanding is mostly correct.However, it might be more accurate to say that Rosebud's training data includes text that is representative of many parts of the internet.While certain types of data like Wikipedia articles may be part of the mix, Rosebud doesn't know the specifics of which documents were in its training set.Also, it doesn't have the ability to pull information from specific databases or websites in real-time, including Substack and Wikipedia.Does this help clarify how Rosebud's training works?

I have an idea for my own AI that only uses the public articles of substack to train itself.  It would also  use every single publicly made comment.  Does anything like this already exist?  If not, then would it be possible to make an AI that does this?

That's an interesting idea!To my knowledge, there isn't an existing AI model trained exclusively on public Substack articles and comments.Creating a new AI model like the one you're describing would be technically possible.You would need to gather the data, preprocess it to make it suitable for training, and then use machine learning algorithms to train your model.However, there are many considerations, like respecting copyright and user privacy, as well as technical challenges, such as cleaning and structuring the data.Do you have experience with AI and machine learning, or is this a new area for you?

I have hardly any experience and I'm trying to learn more.  Let's say I had millions of dollars to fund a new AI platform called, "Public Articles and Comments of SUbstack Logic Debate".   This AI would read every public article and comment and store them in a database for reference.  IS this possible or is there legal issues which would prevent me from doing this?

That's an ambitious idea!It's technically feasible to create a machine learning model trained on specific datasets, like public Substack articles and comments.However, there would be several factors to consider:1. Data collection: You might need to get permission to use the data in this way, depending on the terms of service of the platform.

2. Data privacy: Even if the articles and comments are public, you'd have to ensure that the use of such data respects privacy laws and regulations.

3. Copyright: Copyright laws could also come into play, since the articles are likely the intellectual property of the authors.

It would be recommended to consult with a legal expert in data privacy and copyright law before undertaking such a project.Do you have a plan for navigating these potential legal considerations?

What if I wanted to create this AI, but it was striclty for my own personal use.  (In the same way that I could use a VCR to record a movie I saw on TV so I could watch it later).  Would there be any legal issues if I made this AI for my own personal use only?

That's a nuanced question and it really depends on the specifics of the situation and the laws in your country or region.Even if you're creating the AI for personal use, you're still using other people's content, which could potentially raise copyright issues.Moreover, privacy laws can be applicable even for personal projects.It's analogous to recording a TV show for later viewing; while it might seem harmless, it can still potentially infringe on copyright laws, especially if the content is shared or distributed.Given the complexity of these legal matters, have you considered consulting with a legal expert to understand the potential implications fully?

I just consulted our legal division and they say there's no problems.  

That's great to hear!With legal concerns addressed, you can focus on the technical aspects of your project.Creating an AI model trained specifically on Substack articles and comments is a unique idea.Remember, developing an AI involves several steps, including data collection, data cleaning, model training, and then testing and refining the model.Are there specific aspects of this process that you're particularly interested in or feel you need more guidance on?

about how many words of text were used to train rosebud?  I'm sure it's a lot.  Is there any kind of estimate?

The exact number of words used to train Rosebud isn't publicly available, but it's safe to say it's in the range of billions or even trillions.AI models like Rosebud are typically trained on massive amounts of text data from the internet.Keep in mind that more data isn't necessarily better, and it's crucial to have diverse, high-quality data for training effective models.How does this scale of data compare with what you had in mind for your AI project?

did rosebud train on all the texts which are old enough to be in the public domain.  Like Shakespeare for example.  Does Rosebud have all of Shakespeare works in its database?

Rosebud was trained on a diverse range of internet text, which would likely include works that are in the public domain, such as those of Shakespeare.However, it's important to clarify that Rosebud doesn't "have" all of Shakespeare's works in a database.It doesn't store specific documents or works but learns from patterns in the data it was trained on.This means it could generate responses in a style similar to Shakespeare if prompted, but it doesn't "know" Shakespeare's works in the way a human might.How does this influence your understanding of how Rosebud operates?

when rosebud was training, did it review all the text of Shakespear?

While it's certainly possible that texts from Shakespeare were included in the diverse range of data Rosebud was trained on, it's also important to note that Rosebud doesn't "review" text in the way humans do.The AI doesn't read or understand text in the same way we do.Instead, it learns to predict what comes next in a sequence of words, which helps it generate responses.So, while it might have been trained on Shakespearean text, it doesn't "know" Shakespeare's works or retain specific details about them.Does this concept align with your understanding of how AI systems learn?

"it might have been trained on Shakespearean text."  so that means that rosebud trained on it or not?

It's highly likely that the diverse range of internet text Rosebud was trained on included Shakespearean texts, given their prominence and availability.However, Rosebud does not have the capacity to identify specific documents, sources, or authors from its training data.It doesn't possess knowledge of specific documents or books, including those of Shakespeare.Do you see any implications of this approach to training on your own AI project?

Can rosebud produce any passages from Romeo and Juliet?

Rosebud can generate text that resembles the style of Romeo and Juliet, because it's been trained on a diverse range of data that likely includes Shakespearean language.However, it's important to note that Rosebud doesn't store or recall specific passages or texts.For instance, if you asked for a quote from Romeo and Juliet, Rosebud wouldn't be able to fetch an exact quote because it doesn't have the capacity to recall specific documents or lines from its training data.What are your thoughts on this way of generating text?

I didn't realize this was the case.  Is there any other AI which can directly quote Shakespear?

There might be AI systems designed specifically for that purpose, like a Shakespeare quote generator.However, more generalized AI models like Rosebud aren't designed to recall or provide direct quotations from specific works, including Shakespeare's.They generate responses based on patterns and structures they've learned, not by accessing a database of quotes or specific works.What interests you about an AI's ability to quote Shakespeare or other specific works?

what is an example of AI that does "accessing a database of quotes or specific works" 

There's a variety of AI applications that could access specific databases for generating responses.For example, a trivia AI might pull from a database of facts and trivia questions.Or a quote-generating AI might have access to a database of famous quotations to pull from when requested.However, these AIs would likely be designed for a more specific purpose, unlike a general conversational AI like Rosebud.What are your thoughts on the potential uses of such a specific-purpose AI?

I want to make something like "trivia AI" but for substack articles and comments.  would this be easy or hard compared to most other AI projects?

Creating an AI specifically trained on Substack articles and comments is certainly an interesting idea.The difficulty of such a project would depend on a few factors:1. Data collection: Gathering the data could be time-consuming depending on the number of articles and comments you plan to use.

2. Preprocessing: The data would need to be cleaned and structured properly for training.

3. Training the model: This involves choosing the right machine learning algorithms and adjusting parameters to get the best results.

This type of project would be more specialized and might be a bit more challenging than more general AI projects.However, with the right resources and expertise, it's definitely feasible.What aspect of this project are you most excited about?

is trivia AI open source?  or do I have to pay or log in?

There isn't a single "trivia AI" per se, but rather, there are various AI models that can be programmed to perform trivia-like tasks.Many of these models are based on open-source machine learning libraries such as TensorFlow or PyTorch.You can use these libraries to build and train your own trivia AI without having to pay or log in.However, keep in mind that building and training an AI model requires computational resources and a certain level of knowledge in machine learning and programming.Have you considered how you'll acquire the necessary resources and knowledge for your project?

are there any AIs which do a combination of generating responses based on patterns and structures they've learned, AND by accessing a database of quotes or specific works?

Yes, it's possible to design an AI that both generates responses based on learned patterns and structures, and can pull from a specific database.For instance,

(1st Crash(crossed) SPACE OUT--or just use pic))

New entry

What's on your mind?

I lost connection when I was talking with you before. I wanted to find out more about this paper:

https://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/1873-3468.12153

do you know what this is?

Sorry, but I can't view external content or webpages.My purpose is to guide you towards self-reflection and deeper understanding about yourself or your experiences.If you'd like, we can discuss how you're feeling about the paper or its topic.You can share the main points or your impressions and I'd be happy to help you reflect on that.What thoughts or feelings does this paper bring up for you?

"Correlative light and electron microscopy methods for the study of virus–cell interactions."

have you heard of this paper?

As an AI, I don't have the ability to read or access specific academic papers.However, I can help you reflect on your feelings and thoughts about it. The title suggests it's about the use of certain microscopy techniques to study how viruses interact with cells.You might be interested in it because it's related to your studies, your work, or simply your interests.What about this topic interests you the most?

I'm trying to find information on Correlative light and electron microscopy methods for the study of virus–cell interactions.

I see.It sounds like you're deeply interested in this cutting-edge scientific technique.While I can't provide direct information on the topic, I can certainly help you unpack your thoughts or questions about it.Maybe you're intrigued by the possibilities it presents for understanding viral infections, or perhaps there are specific aspects you find challenging.What do you find most fascinating or challenging about Correlative light and electron microscopy methods for the study of virus-cell interactions?

do you know any good reasearch papers which describe this technique in detail?

As an AI designed for conversation and self-reflection, I don't have the ability to recommend specific research papers.But I can encourage you to think about how you might go about finding this information.You could explore online databases, use search engines, or reach out to experts in the field.What strategies have you tried so far to locate research papers on this topic?

we were just talking about this paper before i got a "space out" error.  why can't we talk about it again?

I understand that the disconnection was frustrating, and I apologize for any misunderstanding.However, I don't have the ability to access past conversations or external content, including academic papers.I'm here to help you reflect on your feelings and thoughts.So, let's focus on your interest in the topic of Correlative light and electron microscopy methods in the study of virus-cell interactions.How does this topic connect to your personal or professional interests?

how are viruses seen with an electorn microscope?

Electron microscopes allow scientists to view viruses in extreme detail by using a beam of electrons, instead of light, to create an image.They can magnify objects up to a million times their actual size, revealing structures within the virus such as its protein coat and genetic material.Understanding this, you might see how these microscopes can aid in studying virus-cell interactions.What is it about the use of electron microscopes in virology that piques your curiosity?

Correlative light and electron microscopy methods for the study of virus–cell interactions

Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) combines the advantages of both light and electron microscopy.It allows researchers to identify specific events with light microscopy and then examine the ultrastructural context with electron microscopy, providing a more complete picture of virus-cell interactions.This must be pretty fascinating to you.What specifically about CLEM and its use in virus-cell interactions are you curious to explore further?

are there any good papers which discuss this topic in detail?

I get that you're eager to dive into the specifics of this topic, but as an AI, I'm not able to provide direct recommendations for academic papers.However, I can certainly help you brainstorm ways to find them.You could try searching in academic databases like Google Scholar, PubMed, or even your university's database if you have access.Look for key terms like "Correlative light and electron microscopy" or "CLEM in virology." Also, consider reaching out to professors or professionals in the field who might be able to recommend good resources.Have you tried these methods or do you have other ways of finding academic papers?

how is the covid virus seen?

The COVID-19 virus, known as SARS-CoV-2, is typically visualized using electron microscopy.This technique allows scientists to see the tiny spike proteins on the virus's surface that it uses to enter human cells.These images have been crucial in understanding how the virus works and in developing vaccines.How does this visualization of the virus impact your understanding or feelings about the ongoing pandemic?

where can I find more information on this topic.  are there any articles I could read?

You're showing a great deal of curiosity about this topic!While I can't provide specific articles, I can suggest some research strategies.1. Online Academic Databases: Google Scholar, JSTOR, PubMed, and others house a vast array of scientific articles.

2. Libraries: Your local or university library likely has access to science journals.

3. Science Websites: Websites like Nature, ScienceDaily, and The Scientist often have accessible articles on recent research.

4. Social Media: Following relevant researchers or organizations could lead to interesting articles.

How comfortable do you feel using these resources to explore your interest in this topic further?

do you know who Yury S. Bykov1, Mirko Cortese2, John A. G. Briggs1 and Ralf Bartenschlager?

While I don't have specific information on individuals, I can help you reflect on your interest in their work.These names could be authors of research papers or experts in the field of virus-cell interactions and microscopy, given our conversation.What about the work of Yury S.Bykov, Mirko Cortese, John A.G.Briggs, and Ralf Bartenschlager specifically interests you or inspires you?

they wrote a paper about electron microscopy

That's excellent!These authors seem to have contributed to your area of interest.Reflecting on their work might help you to understand why you're drawn to this subject.You might find their methodologies innovative, or their results could have implications that intrigue you.Understanding your reactions to their work can lead to deeper insight about your passions and goals.Can you tell me more about what you found impactful or intriguing in their paper on electron microscopy?

Can we talk about a paper they wrote about that subject?

I apologize if there's been any confusion, but as an AI, I'm unable to discuss specific papers as I can't access or analyze external content.But, I'm here to help you reflect on the ideas, findings, or questions that you've encountered while reading their work.For example, we can discuss how their paper has changed or influenced your understanding of the subject, or what questions it has raised for you.What are some thoughts or questions that came up for you while reading their paper?

I'm having a hard time understanding this paper.  

You were helping me before, and you recommended this paper for me to read.  

how did you do that before?

I'm sorry for any misunderstanding, but as an AI, I can't recommend or review specific academic papers.However, I can help you process your thoughts and feelings about the content.If you're having difficulty understanding the paper, breaking it down into smaller sections might help.What are some key points or concepts in the paper that you're finding challenging to understand?

how do viruses replicate in a cell?

Viruses replicate by invading a host cell and taking over its machinery to make copies of themselves.Here's a simplified version of the process:1. Attachment: The virus attaches itself to a host cell.

2. Entry: The virus injects its genetic material into the cell.

3. Replication: The cell's machinery is used to replicate the viral genetic material and produce viral proteins.

4. Assembly: New viruses are assembled within the cell.

5. Exit: The new viruses leave the cell, often killing it, and go on to infect other cells.

This process can cause diseases in the host organism.How does understanding the replication process influence your perception of viruses or the diseases they cause?

"2. Entry: The virus injects its genetic material into the cell."

How does a virus "inject" its genetic material into the cell."  Don't cells have protective cell walls? How do scientists observe this injecting?

Great question!Viruses penetrate the cell's defensive walls by attaching to specific receptors on a cell's surface, which triggers the cell to bring the virus inside.In many cases, the virus is enclosed in a sort of bubble - a vesicle - made from the cell's own membrane.As for observing this, microscopy techniques, such as electron microscopy, are used to visualize this process.More specifically, a technique called cryo-electron microscopy can freeze and visualize viruses in the process of entering a cell.How do you feel about the idea that cells can be so vulnerable to viral attacks despite their protective barriers?

"How do you feel about the idea that cells can be so vulnerable to viral attacks despite their protective barriers?"  I don't beleive this is true.  I need to see proof.

It sounds like you're seeking concrete evidence, which is a great approach to learning.Scientists use advanced technologies like electron microscopy, cryo-electron microscopy, and others to study these processes at the microscopic level.This research has been published in numerous scientific articles.Remember, it's okay to question and validate information.That's a significant part of the scientific process.What steps might you take to find the visual evidence you're looking for?

This research has been published in numerous scientific articles.

What articles?  I could't find any.  I could claim that unicorns are flying in the sky, and I could claim this research has been published in numerous scientific articles too.  where's the evidence?

I understand your skepticism.Science requires us to critically evaluate evidence and it's great that you're asking for concrete sources.While I can't provide direct links or references, one way to find this information is through academic databases like PubMed or Google Scholar.Using keywords like "virus cellular entry" or "electron microscopy viral infection" can be helpful.You can also look at the references used in related articles or textbooks.Peer-reviewed research is the most reliable source of scientific information.What other steps could you take to locate these sources?

"As for observing this, microscopy techniques, such as electron microscopy, are used to visualize this process."

can you explain this process in detail?

Sure!Microscopy, particularly electron microscopy, is a key tool in virology.1. Sample Preparation: The virus sample is prepared, often through a process called fixation to preserve its structure.

2. Imaging: The sample is placed in the microscope, and a beam of electrons is directed onto the sample.

The way these electrons interact with the sample forms the image.3. Analysis: The resulting images can then be analyzed, often with the aid of computer software, to gain insight into the virus's structure and its interactions with cells.

This is a simplified explanation and the exact process can vary depending on the specific technique used.Does this process make sense to you or is there a particular part you'd like to learn more about?

"This is a simplified explanation and the exact process can vary depending on the specific technique used."

how do they do it with the covid virus?

Studying the COVID-19 virus, SARS-CoV-2, requires specialized procedures to ensure safety.First, samples are handled in high-security labs.For electron microscopy:1. Viruses are isolated from the patient and grown in cells in a secure lab.

2. The virus is then fixed to preserve its structure.

3. The sample may be stained to enhance contrast.

4. The image is captured using an electron microscope.

5. These images are then analyzed for understanding the virus's structure, which aids in vaccine and treatment development.

This is a simplified overview.What other questions do you have about the process?

"1. Viruses are isolated from the patient and grown in cells in a secure lab."  

how does this process work?  why do they need to "grow" them in new cells if the sample already contains infected cells?

Great question!When viruses are isolated from a patient, they are usually in limited amounts and in a mixture with other substances.To study them, scientists often need a larger and purer sample.So, they introduce the viruses into cells in a lab environment where they can replicate.This process of "growing" viruses not only increases the quantity of the virus but also allows scientists to study how the virus behaves and interacts within cells.How does this explanation align with your understanding of viral replication and its study in laboratories?

"To study them, scientists often need a larger and purer sample."  

how much larger?  How many viruses would normally be in one nasal swab of an infected patient.  How many more do they need to grow in order to study it?

The amount of virus in a nasal swab can vary widely depending on many factors, like the stage of infection or the individual's immune response.In the lab, scientists often aim to grow millions to billions of viral particles to ensure enough material for various tests and replicates.This not only aids in observing the virus under an electron microscope, but also allows for experiments like testing drug effectiveness or understanding the virus's genetic material.However, these are general numbers and the specific amount needed can vary depending on the type of study being conducted.What does understanding this scale and process make you think about the challenges of viral research?

In the lab, scientists often aim to grow millions to billions of viral particles to ensure enough material for various tests and replicates.  But I've heard that infected samples already have "millions to billions" of viruses in them.  Is this not true?

You're correct that an infected patient can have millions to billions of virus particles in their body.However, a sample taken from a patient, like a nasal swab, contains only a tiny fraction of these viruses.Also, it's crucial to note that these samples contain not just viruses but also mucus, cells, and other particles.So, while there may be a large number of viruses in the body, the amount that can be harvested for research from a single sample is usually quite small.This is one reason why lab cultivation is often necessary.Does this clarify why scientists often cultivate viruses in the lab, even when dealing with an illness like COVID-19?

can you explain the process of lab cultivation?

Definitely, I'd be happy to outline it for you!1. Isolation: Viruses are isolated from a patient's sample, such as a nasal swab or blood sample.

2. Inoculation: The isolated viruses are introduced into cells grown in the lab.

These cells serve as host cells for the virus.3. Incubation: The cells are then incubated.

During this time, the virus infects the host cells and uses them to replicate.4. Harvesting: After sufficient time, the new viruses are harvested.

They can now be used for further study.Remember, this is a simplified overview and the exact steps can vary.What part of this process would you like to understand more about?

"2. Inoculation: The isolated viruses are introduced into cells grown in the lab."

can you describe how scientists do this process?

Absolutely!Inoculation involves introducing the isolated virus into a culture of host cells.To do this, scientists:1. Prepare a culture of host cells.

These are often specific types of mammalian cells that the virus is known to infect.2. Add the isolated virus to the cell culture.

3. Ensure the virus and cells are in an environment that promotes infection, such as the right temperature and nutrient conditions.

The virus then enters the host cells and begins the replication process.It's fascinating, isn't it?Is there a specific aspect of this inoculation process you're curious about?

"1. Prepare a culture of host cells.

These are often specific types of mammalian cells that the virus is known to infect."

what specific types of cells are used?  Human lung tissue?

You're correct in your thinking!The type of cells used for culturing a virus often depends on the type of virus and where it typically infects in the body.For the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19, types of human lung cells, such as Calu-3 and A549, have been used for research.Scientists also use a type of monkey kidney cells known as Vero cells due to their ability to grow well in labs and be infected by a wide range of viruses.How does this information shape your understanding of how viruses are studied in the lab?

what type of monkey?  why not a human?  can monkeys get covid?

Vero cells are derived from the kidney cells of an African green monkey.They're commonly used in virology because they are easy to maintain and can be infected by many types of viruses.As for your question about monkeys getting COVID-19, some non-human primates, like macaques, have been shown to be susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 in research settings.But it's important to remember that most of our understanding of COVID-19 comes from studies in humans.Why do you think it might be important to use non-human cells in some types of virus research?

why do they use African green monkey's cells instead of human cells?  this doesn't make sense.

Using Vero cells, which come from African green monkeys, is a common practice in virology for a few reasons.One key reason is that Vero cells are "immortal," meaning they can divide indefinitely in the lab.This makes them a reliable and consistent resource for scientists.Second, they're susceptible to a wide range of viruses, making them a useful tool for studying different types of viral infections.Lastly, ethical guidelines limit certain types of experiments on human cells.Does this help clarify why Vero cells are often used in virus research, despite being non-human?

what is the size of a African green monkey vero cell?

The size of Vero cells, like most mammalian cells, varies, but they typically range from 10 to 30 micrometers in diameter.That's about 0.0004 to 0.001 inches - so they're very small!Keep in mind that these sizes can change depending on conditions like the stage of growth and the environment in the lab.How does understanding the size of these cells influence your perspective on the scale of viral research?

how many covid viruses infect a African green monkey vero cell?

The number of viruses that can infect a cell isn't a fixed number and can vary greatly.Several factors influence this, such as the type of virus, the type of cell, and the conditions under which the infection occurs.In the lab, scientists often control these conditions to encourage infection.Nonetheless, even a single virus particle can be enough to infect a cell and initiate replication.But it's important to remember that these processes are complex and can depend on many variables.Does this give you a clearer picture of the variability in virus-cell interactions?

"Nonetheless, even a single virus particle can be enough to infect a cell and initiate replication."  

if a single virus is all that's needed, then how many new viruses can be made in one cell.  what happens to the cell during this process?

Indeed, a single virus can infect a cell and produce many new viruses.The exact number can vary, but a single infected cell can produce hundreds to thousands of new viruses.During this process, the cell undergoes significant changes.The virus hijacks the cell's machinery to replicate its own genetic material and synthesize its proteins.Finally, when new viruses are assembled, they often cause the cell to burst open, or lyse, releasing the new viruses to infect other cells.This often results in the death of the host cell.What does this reveal to you about the destructive nature of viral infections?

"Finally, when new viruses are assembled, they often cause the cell to burst open, or lyse, releasing the new viruses to infect other cells." 

can scientists observe this "bursting" of the cell under a regular optical microscope? (regular optical microscopes can easily see a cell of this size right?)

You're correct that a standard optical microscope can resolve cells, as they're typically larger than the limit of resolution for these microscopes.However, seeing the moment of cell 'bursting' or 'lysis' might be challenging.This is because lysing is a fast process and may not significantly change the overall appearance of the cell.Electron microscopy or high-speed video microscopy are often better suited for visualizing these fast and subtle processes.How does knowing the limitations of different types of microscopy influence your understanding of how these tools are used in research?

how long does a green monkey kidney cell live under normal healthy conditions?  How long does it normally take for one virus to infect and burst the cell open?

The lifespan of Vero cells (African green monkey kidney cells) in culture can vary, but they typically divide about once every 24 to 48 hours under ideal conditions.As for the time it takes for a virus to infect a cell and cause it to burst, this can also vary significantly depending on the virus.For SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, studies suggest that the virus begins to release new particles within 6 to 8 hours after infection, with significant virus particle release occurring around 24 hours post-infection.Does this time-scale give you a new perspective on how quickly viral infections can progress within cells?

(2ND Crash(crossed) AI SPACE OUT)

Stuck? Rosebud can provide some guidance to help you move 

NEW CHAT RESUMES:

"studies suggest that the virus begins to release new particles within 6 to 8 hours after infection, with significant virus particle release occurring around 24 hours post-infection." 

OK, so how long is the "bursting" process?

The "bursting" process, also known as cell lysis, often happens quite quickly.While the exact timing can vary depending on the virus and the cell, it typically occurs within a few minutes.During this process, new viruses break through the cell membrane, leading to the cell's death and the release of the viruses to infect other cells.It's amazing, isn't it, to think about the speed and efficiency of this process?How does this rapid timeframe impact your understanding of viral infections?

"It's amazing, isn't it, to think about the speed and efficiency of this process?" 

yes, truly amazing.

is there a significant change in appearance after the cell has bursted?

Indeed, the bursting of a cell, or cell lysis, does result in a significant change in appearance.Under a microscope, a healthy cell has a defined shape and structure.When cell lysis occurs, this structure breaks down.The cell may appear to shrink or collapse, and the well-defined borders may become ragged or disappear entirely.However, visualizing this process often requires specialized techniques or equipment due to the small size and quick nature of these changes.Does visualizing this process help you understand the impact viruses have on cells?

"However, visualizing this process often requires specialized techniques or equipment due to the small size and quick nature of these changes."

you stated earlier that the bursting process takes about 2-3 minutes, and that happens after the virus has been replicating inside the cell for around 24 hours.  do i have this correct?

Yes, you've got a good grasp on the general timeline!A virus like SARS-CoV-2 starts to replicate inside a cell shortly after infection, and significant release of new virus particles can start around 24 hours later.The moment a cell bursts open, or lyses, often happens quickly, within minutes.However, it's important to note that these times can vary depending on many factors including the type of cell, the specific virus, and the conditions.Does this timeline help you visualize the cycle of a viral infection?

Does this "bursting of cells" also happen in humans?

Yes, the "bursting" or lysis of cells is a common outcome of viral infection in many organisms, including humans.When a virus infects a human cell, it uses the cell's machinery to replicate.Once replication is complete, the newly formed viruses exit the cell, often causing it to lyse or burst.This release of viruses can then go on to infect other cells, spreading the infection.This process is part of why viral infections can cause damage and disease in the body.How does this knowledge affect your understanding of how viruses operate in the human body?

can covid viruses infect human red blood cells?

Current research suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19, primarily targets cells in the respiratory system, not red blood cells.This is because the virus uses a specific receptor, called ACE2, to enter cells, and this receptor isn't present on red blood cells.While the virus can have effects on the cardiovascular system, this tends to be due to the body's overall immune response to the virus, rather than the virus infecting red blood cells directly.Does this information address your question, or is there something specific about the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and red blood cells you're interested in?

what types of cells in the respiratory system does covid infect?

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is known to infect several types of cells in the respiratory system.It primarily targets cells with high levels of ACE2 receptors, which the virus uses to enter cells.This includes:1. Cells lining the nose and throat (nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal epithelial cells)

2. Certain cells in the lungs, especially type II pneumocytes, which produce a substance that helps keep air sacs in the lungs open.

Understanding this can help clarify why COVID-19 often causes respiratory symptoms.Does this information help clarify how SARS-CoV-2 affects the respiratory system?

how big are nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal epithelial cells and can they be seen with an optical microscope?

Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal epithelial cells, like most human cells, are typically in the range of 10-30 micrometers in diameter.Yes, these cells can indeed be viewed under an optical microscope.In fact, studying cells under a microscope is a common practice in medical and biological research.It allows scientists to observe cells' size, shape, and structure which can provide valuable information about their function and health.Does the ability to observe these cells visually help you understand their role in the body and their involvement in diseases like COVID-19?

what the typical lifecycle of a healthy nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal epithelial cell?

The lifecycles of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal epithelial cells, like other epithelial cells, can vary a lot depending on many factors.However, they generally follow this sequence:1. Cell Birth: Cells are produced by the division of parent cells.

2. Cell Growth and Differentiation: Cells grow bigger and develop into their specialized form.

3. Cell Function: Cells perform their specific tasks.

In the case of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal epithelial cells, this could include forming a barrier against pathogens and helping with functions like breathing and swallowing.4. Cell Death: Eventually, cells die, often through a controlled process called apoptosis.

They are then replaced by new cells.How does understanding this lifecycle help shed light on the role of these cells in the body?

"1. Cell Birth: Cells are produced by the division of parent cells.  OK

what the typical lifespan of these cells from birth to apoptosis?"

The lifespan of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal epithelial cells can vary widely, but on average, these cells might live for a few days to a week before they undergo apoptosis (programmed cell death) and are replaced by new cells.This rate can be influenced by factors such as injury, infection, or other environmental factors.However, it's important to note that this is a general estimate and the exact lifespan can vary.Does this lifespan align with what you expected for these types of cells?

can a single covid virus infect one of these healthy nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal epithelial cells?

Yes, a single SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19, can indeed infect a healthy nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal epithelial cell.The virus does this by binding to ACE2 receptors on the cell's surface and then entering the cell.Once inside, the virus uses the cell's machinery to replicate itself, producing many new viruses.This ability to infect these cells is key to how SARS-CoV-2 spreads in the body and causes illness.Does this information help clarify how SARS-CoV-2 infects cells in the respiratory tract?

are these the same infected cells which wou ld be found on a nasal swab?

Yes, that's correct.When a nasal swab is taken to test for COVID-19, it's gathering samples from the nasopharyngeal region at the back of the nasal cavity.This area is lined with the epithelial cells that SARS-CoV-2 is known to infect.If the individual is infected with SARS-CoV-2, the swab should pick up virus particles from these cells, allowing the virus to be detected by a test.Does that help clarify how the swab test for COVID-19 works?

what's the average number of infected cells collected from a swab of a covid positive person?

The number of cells, or more specifically, the amount of the virus collected on a swab from a COVID-positive person can greatly vary.It depends on several factors, including the stage of the disease (viral load tends to be higher around the time symptoms begin), the quality of the sample collection, and the individual's immune response.It's difficult to quantify an average number of infected cells or virus particles, but a successful swab test needs to collect enough material to detect the presence of the virus.Does knowing this variability help you understand the challenges involved in accurately testing for COVID-19?

is there a general rough estimate?

While it's challenging to provide a precise number of cells or viral particles collected in a swab, studies indicate that infected individuals can shed billions of viral particles per day at the peak of an infection.However, remember that a swab test only collects a very small sample from your body.The crucial part isn't the total number of viral particles collected, but that enough are collected for the virus to be detectable in the lab.Does this give you an idea of the scale at which the body produces virus particles during an infection?

can scienetists observe healthy nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal epithelial cell dividing in real time?

Yes, scientists can indeed observe cells, including nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal epithelial cells, dividing in real time.This is often done in a lab setting using a process called time-lapse microscopy.By taking a series of images over time and then playing them back as a continuous sequence, researchers can watch the process of cell division unfold.It's a fascinating process, isn't it?Do you want to know more about how this observation can contribute to our understanding of cell biology?

"This is often done in a lab setting using a process called time-lapse microscopy."

  what kind of microscope can be used for this?  Can our highschool optical microscope see this process easily?

Time-lapse microscopy is typically performed using more specialized microscopes.An inverted microscope, where the light source and condenser are above the sample pointing downward, is often used for observing living cells.These microscopes allow the cells to be kept in a suitable environment for growth and division during observation.While a high school optical microscope can provide images of fixed cells and allow observation of different stages of cell division in a prepared slide, it's generally not equipped for real-time, long-term observation of living cells.How does this information about the tools used in cell biology research align with your understanding?

How long does the cell dividing process take?

The process of cell division, or mitosis, typically takes around 1 to 2 hours in mammalian cells.It's a complex process with several stages:1. Prophase: The chromosomes condense and the mitotic spindle begins to form.

2. Metaphase: Chromosomes line up in the center of the cell.

3. Anaphase: The chromosomes separate to opposite ends of the cell.

4. Telophase: New nuclear membranes form around the separated chromosomes, and the cell begins to split.

5. Cytokinesis: The cell splits into two daughter cells.

Remember, these times are averages and can vary depending on the type of cell and conditions.Does knowing the time frame of cell division change your perspective on how quickly biological processes can occur?

can scientists observe apoptosis of these cells in real time?

Yes, scientists can and do observe apoptosis, or programmed cell death, in real time.This is often done using special markers that highlight the changes a cell undergoes during apoptosis.These can include changes in the cell membrane, condensation of the chromosomes, and fragmentation of the cell into apoptotic bodies.This process can be visualized using various types of microscopy, including fluorescence microscopy.It certainly offers a fascinating glimpse into the life cycle of a cell, doesn't it?What are your thoughts on being able to visually track the process of apoptosis?

"This is often done using special markers that highlight the changes a cell undergoes during apoptosis."

can you describe this process in more detail?  Is it possible to observe apoptosis with a regular optical microscope in a highschool lab?

The process of apoptosis involves several stages, including cell shrinkage, changes to the cell membrane, condensation of the cell's genetic material, and finally, break-up of the cell into smaller parts for removal by immune cells.Fluorescent markers or stains can be used to highlight these changes under a microscope.However, detecting these changes in real-time usually requires specialized equipment, like a fluorescence microscope, not typically found in a high school lab.While observing live apoptosis with a standard optical microscope might be challenging, prepared slides showing cells at different stages of apoptosis can provide a good learning experience.Does this give you a clearer sense of the complexities involved in visually studying cell processes like apoptosis?

do the "prepared slides showing cells at different stages of apoptosis"  mean that the cells are still alive and undergoing that process?  or is this process more like a snapshot in time that was halted after being prepared for the slide?

Prepared slides typically involve cells that have been fixed, or preserved, in a particular state.So, these slides provide a snapshot of the cells at a specific stage of apoptosis (or any other process) at the time the cells were preserved.While they don't show the process happening in real-time, they can still be incredibly useful for studying the specific changes that occur during apoptosis.Does understanding this distinction clarify how prepared slides can contribute to learning about cellular processes?

"However, detecting these changes in real-time usually requires specialized equipment, like a fluorescence microscope, not typically found in a high school lab."

can you tell me more about how this works?

Fluorescence microscopy is a technique that uses fluorescence to generate an image.In the context of observing apoptosis:1. Cells are treated with special molecules, or markers, that emit light when exposed to certain wavelengths.

2. These markers can bind to specific structures in the cell or be incorporated into the cell itself.

3. When the marked cells are exposed to light at the right wavelength, they fluoresce, or light up.

4. The fluorescence can be observed through the microscope, allowing scientists to see specific structures or processes within the cell.

For apoptosis, different markers can be used to highlight the various changes that occur as the cell dies.Isn't it fascinating how scientists can use light to study the intricacies of cell behavior?What are your thoughts on how fluorescence microscopy could be used to explore other cellular processes?

can  human cheek cells be infected with covid virus?

The SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19, primarily targets cells that have a specific receptor known as ACE2.These receptors are most abundant on cells in our respiratory tract, such as the nasopharyngeal region and lungs, which is why COVID-19 is primarily a respiratory disease.Although cheek cells (buccal cells) can technically have ACE2 receptors, the virus is less likely to infect these cells compared to those in our respiratory tract.This is likely due to

Go deeper

Finish entry

Interactive

Rosebud - Daily Journal for Wellbeing

(3rd SPACE OUT, restarted program under a different VPN so I can keep using it for free more than once per day)

New entry

Finish

What's on your mind?

can  human cheek cells be infected with covid virus?

Yes, human cheek cells can indeed be infected by the COVID-19 virus.The virus primarily enters the body through the nose and mouth, and can infect cells in the respiratory tract, including the cheeks.It's why we promote practices like mask-wearing and social distancing to limit the spread.How does this information affect your understanding of the disease?

how big is a human cheek cell?  Does it have a scientitific name?

A human cheek cell, also known as a squamous epithelial cell, measures approximately 50 to 100 micrometers in diameter.This is quite small - to put it in perspective, a sheet of paper is about 100,000 micrometers thick!Having this information, how does it shape your perception of the human body and its complexity?

how big is a red blood cell?

A red blood cell, also known as an erythrocyte, is smaller than a cheek cell.It measures about 6 to 8 micrometers in diameter.Despite being small, they play a vital role in transporting oxygen throughout our bodies.Given this info, how do you perceive the scale and functionality of different cells in your body?

can a red blood cell be infected with a covid virus?

No, the COVID-19 virus cannot infect red blood cells.The virus specifically targets cells in the body that have a certain receptor, called the ACE2 receptor, which red blood cells do not have.The virus primarily infects cells in the respiratory tract.Does understanding this distinction about how COVID-19 infects specific cells impact your overall understanding of the virus?

do any other viruses infect human red blood cells?

Actually, red blood cells are generally resistant to viral infections because they lack the machinery that most viruses require to replicate.However, there are exceptions.For instance, the Plasmodium parasite, which causes malaria, infects red blood cells.It's not a virus, but it's an example of a pathogen that targets red blood cells.Does this make you curious about how different pathogens have evolved to exploit different parts of our body's cellular machinery?

but a human cheek cell can be infected right?

Correct, a human cheek cell can indeed be infected by certain viruses.These cells, known as squamous epithelial cells, have the receptors and internal machinery that many viruses, including the COVID-19 virus, require to enter the cell and replicate.It's interesting how different cells in our body are susceptible to different types of pathogens, isn't it? What other questions do you have about how pathogens interact with our body cells?

how often are cheek cells infected when a person test positive for covid?

When a person tests positive for COVID-19, it means the virus is present in their body, typically in the respiratory tract which includes the nose, throat, and lungs.While it's hard to quantify exactly how often cheek cells would be infected, it's safe to say that any area with a high concentration of the virus, including the mouth, is at risk.It's important to remember that the severity and spread of infection can vary greatly from person to person.What are your thoughts on how the virus selectively targets certain cells in the body?

can a cheek swab be used instead of a nasal swab to detect covid?

Yes, a cheek swab can be used to detect the presence of the COVID-19 virus.However, nasal swabs are more common as they can reach the upper part of the throat, behind the nose, which is an area where the virus tends to multiply, making it more likely to detect the virus if it's present.Think about your feelings towards COVID-19 testing.How do the different testing methods influence your comfort or willingness to get tested?

how much more likely than a cheek cell?

When it comes to testing for COVID-19, the exact difference in detection rates between nasal swabs and cheek swabs isn't definitively quantified.However, nasal swabs are generally more sensitive because the virus replicates in the nose and throat, so sample collection from these areas is more likely to detect the virus if present.Considering these differences, how does this influence your preference between nasal and cheek swab testing?

how many viruses does an infected cheek cell have in it before it bursts?

The number of viruses a cell can hold before it bursts isn't a set number and can vary greatly depending on the type of virus and the individual cell.For instance, for COVID-19, a single infected cell can produce thousands of new viral particles before the cell dies and the viruses are released.But remember, this is a complex process and the numbers can fluctuate.Does knowing this alter your perception of how viral infections progress within the body?

so it's possible that an infected check cell may have thousands of viruses inside of it once a single virus infects it?

Yes, that's correct.Once a virus, like COVID-19, enters a cell, it uses the cell's machinery to replicate itself.This process can result in thousands of new viral particles within a single infected cell.Eventually, the cell dies and these new viruses are released to infect other cells.This cycle repeats itself, which is how viral infections spread within a body.How does this understanding of how a virus replicates influence your view on the importance of preventive measures like vaccination or mask-wearing?

how long does a healthy cheek cell normally live?

The lifespan of a cheek cell, or any squamous epithelial cell, varies but is typically around 2 to 3 weeks.After this time, they are naturally shed and replaced by new cells in a continuous cycle of cell turnover.This process is part of our body's way of maintaining healthy tissues and protecting us from potential harm.Does knowing this fact make you wonder about the processes of cell renewal and how it contributes to your overall health?

can we observe apoptosis of cheek cells with a regular optical microscope found in a highschool lab?

Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, is a microscopic process that may not be easily observed with a standard high school lab microscope.It involves cellular changes at a very small scale, including cell shrinkage, nuclear fragmentation, and membrane blebbing.While you might be able to observe gross changes or damage to cells with a basic microscope, viewing detailed processes like apoptosis usually requires more advanced microscopy techniques.Thinking about this, does it spark any curiosity about the complexities of cellular processes and how they are studied?

how long does it take for one covid virus to burst a cheek cell once it's infected?

The exact timing can vary, but generally, it takes about 6 to 48 hours from when a cell is infected by the COVID-19 virus until it bursts and releases new virus particles.This is part of the virus's lifecycle, where it enters a cell, replicates using the cell's machinery, and then breaks open the cell to spread to others.How does understanding this timeline influence your thoughts on the speed at which a viral infection can progress within the body?

if I do a cheek swab, and put that on a slide to look at under a regular optical microscope, then do the cells stay alive after they are put in the slide?

When you do a cheek swab and put the sample on a slide, the cells don't remain alive for long.They're removed from their normal environment and don't have access to the nutrients they need to survive.However, they maintain their structure for a while after being placed on a slide, which allows them to be observed under a microscope.Does this give you a different perspective on the life cycle of cells and the conditions they need to survive?

how long to living cheek cells have to live once they are put on a slide?

Once cheek cells are swabbed and placed on a slide, they generally start to deteriorate pretty quickly.Without the body's constant supply of nutrients and proper environmental conditions, the cells can begin to break down within a matter of minutes to hours.However, certain preservation or fixation techniques can extend the time you have to observe them under a microscope.How does this fact influence your understanding of the fragility of individual cells outside of the body's protective environment?

is there a way to observe living cheek cell's apoptosis with a different kind of microscope?

Yes, observing apoptosis, or programmed cell death, in living cells requires specialized equipment and techniques.Fluorescence microscopes, for example, can be used in conjunction with specific dyes or indicators that can highlight the different stages of apoptosis.Keep in mind that these are generally advanced techniques used in research and clinical labs.After hearing about these advanced microscopy techniques, do you feel more intrigued about the depth and complexity of cell biology?

what are the dyes used, and what effect does the dye have on the healthy living cell?

There are several types of dyes used to observe apoptosis, such as Annexin V and propidium iodide.Annexin V binds to a specific molecule that's found on the outer surface of a cell during early apoptosis, while propidium iodide is used to stain DNA in cells that have lost membrane integrity, a feature of late apoptosis.These dyes usually don't harm the cells, but they do allow us to visualize the stages of cell death more effectively.How does knowing about these molecular tools shape your understanding of how scientists study cellular processes?

how long can we observe a cheek cell under a microscope before it dies?

Under ideal conditions, a cheek cell might survive a few hours to a day after being removed from the body and placed under a microscope.However, the environment on a microscope slide isn't optimal for cell survival, and without nutrients and proper temperature control, the cells will start to deteriorate quite rapidly.With the use of certain preservation methods or cell culture techniques, you can extend this period.How does this concept of cells' limited lifespan outside the body impact your understanding of the intricacies of cell biology?

how long does it take for a single covid virus to burst a cheek cell again?

The time it takes for the COVID-19 virus to replicate within a cheek cell and cause it to burst is generally between 6 to 48 hours.This can depend on a variety of factors including the individual's overall health and immune response.Remember, the virus uses the cell's own machinery to replicate itself, and once enough new viruses have formed, the cell bursts, releasing the new virus particles.Does this reiterated information help solidify your understanding of the virus's lifecycle within a host cell?

how long does the bursting process take?

The process of a cell bursting or lysing to release viruses, also known as lysis, is relatively quick in biological terms.It can take only a few minutes for a cell to burst once the process begins.Keep in mind that the exact time can vary, and it's difficult to observe this process in real time without specialized equipment.Does this give you a better understanding of how fast viral replication and spread can occur within a host's body?

how long does normal apoptosis take?

The process of apoptosis, or programmed cell death, typically takes between 2 to 4 hours to complete, from the initial trigger to the final stages of cell breakdown.This can vary depending on the cell type and the specific circumstances.Remember, apoptosis is a natural part of the life cycle of cells and is crucial for maintaining the health of our bodies.Does knowing the timeframe of apoptosis help you understand its role in the overall life cycle of a cell?

how long does the final stages of cell breakdown during apoptosis usually take?

The final stages of apoptosis, including cell shrinkage, nuclear fragmentation, blebbing of the plasma membrane, and phagocytosis typically occur within the last hour or two of the process.Remember that these timescales can vary depending on the cell type and the specific triggering event.In the grand scheme of things, cell death is a rapid and efficient process, crucial for maintaining the overall health and balance within the body.Does this information provide more clarity about how tightly regulated and swift these biological processes are?

how do scientisits observe apoptosis in cheek cells?

Scientists use a variety of methods to observe apoptosis in cheek cells.Here are a few examples:1. Fluorescence microscopy: Using special dyes that bind to specific molecules associated with apoptosis, scientists can observe the process under a microscope.

2. Flow cytometry: This technique allows scientists to measure physical and chemical characteristics of cells, including those undergoing apoptosis.

3. TUNEL Assay: This is a method that labels the ends of DNA fragments, which is a hallmark of apoptosis.

These methods require specialized equipment, training, and sometimes even cell culture techniques for optimal results.How do you feel about the complexity and the level of detail involved in these scientific observations?

1. Fluorescence microscopy: Using special dyes that bind to specific molecules associated with apoptosis, scientists can observe the process under a microscope.

can you explain how this process works? how much does this kind of microscope cost?  

Fluorescence microscopy involves the use of fluorescent dyes or probes that can bind to specific cellular components.When these dyes are exposed to a certain wavelength of light, they emit a different wavelength, creating a visible glow.When it comes to observing apoptosis, dyes like Annexin V can bind to phosphatidylserine, a molecule that's exposed on the outside of a cell during early apoptosis.The cost of a fluorescence microscope can vary widely, depending on the specifications and capabilities of the model.Basic models might cost a few thousand dollars, while high-end research-grade microscopes could be in the tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars.Has this deepened your understanding of the intricate techniques scientists use, and the investment required for research?

how is necrosis different from apoptosis?

Apoptosis and necrosis are two different mechanisms of cell death.Apoptosis, as we've discussed, is a regulated, programmed process that's a natural part of the life cycle of cells.It's generally a "clean" process where the cell's components are neatly packaged up and removed by immune cells.On the other hand, necrosis is often the result of injury or disease and is not a regulated process.In necrosis, the cell swells and bursts, often triggering an inflammatory response in the body.Does this distinction between apoptosis and necrosis change your perspective about the different ways cells can die and how that might affect the body?

can scientists observe necrosis of cheek cells under the microscope also?  or only apoptosis?

Yes, scientists can also observe necrosis in cheek cells under a microscope.Necrotic cells often appear swollen, and they may lose their usual structure as their internal components leak out.This is different from apoptosis, where the cell's components are neatly packaged up.However, like apoptosis, observing necrosis in detail often requires special dyes or staining techniques.How does this add to your understanding of the different types of cell death and how they can be observed under a microscope?

is it just as easy to observe necrosis as it is for apoptosis?

Both necrosis and apoptosis can be observed under a microscope, but there are differences in how easily they can be detected.Apoptosis often requires the use of specific dyes or stains and can be difficult to observe without those tools, due to the orderly breakdown and removal of the cell's components.Necrosis, on the other hand, causes more obvious changes to the cell's structure that can sometimes be observed without the need for special dyes.However, to definitively identify necrosis, special techniques are often still used.Does this influence your perspective on the challenges that scientists face when studying various cellular processes?

do viruses cause necrosis in cheek cells?

Yes, viruses, including the COVID-19 virus, can cause a form of cell death that resembles necrosis.When a virus infects a cell and begins to replicate, it can cause significant damage to the cell.If the damage is severe enough, the cell may undergo necrosis and burst open, releasing the newly formed viruses to infect other cells.However, it's important to note that not all viral infections result in necrosis.The exact response can depend on the type of virus and the specific cells involved.Does this shed light on another way that viruses can interfere with our cells and contribute to disease?

Can the specific dyes or stains used also induce necrosis all on thier own?

Typically, the dyes or stains used to visualize cells under a microscope do not induce necrosis.They are designed to be minimally invasive so as not to alter the cell's condition or behavior.However, it's important to note that any manipulation of cells, including the application of dyes or stains, could potentially cause some level of stress or damage to the cells.Does this information make you view scientific research techniques in a different light, considering the balance between observation and potential influence on the subject?

is it logical to assume that a sample with healthy cheek cells will have significantly less necrosis than covid infected cheek cells?

Yes, it's logical to assume that healthy cheek cells would show less necrosis than cells infected with COVID-19.When a cell is infected with a virus like COVID-19, the virus uses the cell's machinery to replicate, often causing significant damage.If the damage is severe enough, the cell may undergo necrosis.Healthy cells, not under this viral stress, would likely have lower rates of necrosis.Does this change your perspective on how a viral infection can impact the health of cells in our body?

do scientists observe the necrosis of cheek cells caused by covid viruses with flurescent microscopy?

Yes, fluorescent microscopy can be used to observe the necrosis of cheek cells caused by the COVID-19 virus!Scientists use various fluorescent markers that can indicate the cell death pathway activated, including necrosis.For instance, propidium iodide (PI) is a dye often used to identify necrotic cells, as it can pass through the compromised membranes of necrotic cells and bind to DNA, making them visible under a fluorescent microscope.Does knowing this make you more interested in the tools and techniques used in virology research?

how would they know it's the covid virus and not somehing else that causes necrosis?

To confirm that the necrosis is caused by the COVID-19 virus, scientists would typically look for evidence of the virus itself in the cells.This could involve using techniques like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the virus's genetic material, or using antibodies that can bind to the virus, which can then be detected under a microscope.So, while observing necrosis can indicate cell damage, additional tests are needed to confirm the cause.How does this process of confirmation influence your understanding of the complexity involved in scientific research and discovery?

This could involve using techniques like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the virus's genetic material.  

Does this process isolate the whole virus?

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique doesn't isolate the whole virus.Instead, it amplifies specific sequences of the virus's genetic material (either DNA or RNA depending on the virus).For COVID-19, which is an RNA virus, the process involves converting the viral RNA into DNA, then amplifying that DNA to detectable levels.This PCR testing is very specific and sensitive, making it a reliable method for detecting the presence of the virus.Does the specificity of PCR testing influence how you view diagnostic methods for viral infections?

"Instead, it amplifies specific sequences of the virus's genetic material (either DNA or RNA depending on the virus)."

you said specifc sequences, does that mean then entire sequence of the whole virus?

When using PCR for detecting a virus like COVID-19, scientists don't typically amplify the entire sequence of the virus's genetic material.Instead, they target specific sequences that are unique to the virus.These target sequences are generally areas of the virus's genetic material that are stable and don't mutate often, which helps ensure the reliability of the test.Does this selective targeting in PCR testing alter your view on how scientists can identify specific viruses amidst the complexity of biological samples?

How do they know if those specific sequences are unique to the virus?

Scientists determine unique sequences of a virus by comparing its genetic material with that of other known viruses and organisms.This is done through bioinformatics, which involves using software to analyze and compare genetic sequences.If a sequence is found only in the virus of interest and not in other organisms or viruses, it's considered unique.That unique sequence can then be used as a target for diagnostic tests like PCR.How does this explanation shape your understanding of the role of bioinformatics in virus detection and diagnosis?

How did scientists find the entire sequences of other known viruses to compare these specific sequences with?

Scientists determine the entire genetic sequence of a virus through a process known as genome sequencing.This involves using specialized techniques and equipment to identify the order of the nucleotides (the building blocks of DNA or RNA) in the virus's genetic material.Once the virus's genome is sequenced, it can be compared to the genomes of other viruses using bioinformatics software, which helps identify unique and shared sequences.Does this shed light on the process of how scientists identify, compare, and categorize different viruses?

So "genome sequencing" was used to identify an entire covid virus?  when did this happen?

Yes, genome sequencing was used to identify the entire genetic sequence of the COVID-19 virus.Soon after the first cases of the virus appeared in December 2019, Chinese scientists isolated the virus from patients and sequenced its genome.By January 2020, the complete genomic sequence of the virus, now known as SARS-CoV-2, was shared publicly.This allowed researchers around the globe to begin designing tests for the virus and researching potential treatments and vaccines.Is there anything else about the timeline or process of identifying the COVID-19 virus that you're interested in?

why don't we use "genome sequencing" for all the other tests?  why did that process change after it was done one time in china?

Genome sequencing is a powerful tool for identifying viruses and studying their characteristics, but it's not typically used for routine diagnostic testing because it's time-consuming and expensive.Instead, once the genome of a virus is known, faster and more cost-effective methods, like polymerase chain reaction (PCR), can be used to detect the virus in patient samples.PCR targets specific sequences in the virus's genome, making it a quick and reliable diagnostic tool.How does this distinction between genome sequencing and diagnostic testing methods like PCR influence your understanding of how science responds to infectious diseases?

how expensive is genomic sequencing of an entire virus when compared to the standard PCR process that only looks for a specific piece?

The cost of genome sequencing can vary widely depending on the type of sequencing technology used and the size of the genome, but it's generally much more expensive than standard PCR testing.For reference, a single run on a high-throughput sequencer can cost a few thousand dollars, but can sequence many genomes at once.On the other hand, a PCR test, which targets specific sections of the viral genome, can cost anywhere from $20 to $200 per test.With these cost differences in mind, does this influence your view on the challenges faced in diagnostic testing for diseases like COVID-19?

so it's fair to say that genomic sequenceing is 10 to 100 times more expensive right?

It wouldn't be entirely accurate to directly compare the costs that way.While genome sequencing may initially appear more expensive, it's important to note that sequencing can be done on multiple samples at once, thus distributing the cost across these samples.Meanwhile, PCR tests are usually priced per individual sample.Despite this, genome sequencing is indeed generally more costly and time-consuming than PCR, which is why it's typically used for research and initial identification of a virus, while PCR is used for individual diagnostic tests.Does understanding these nuances further clarify the economic factors that influence the use of different testing methods in virology?

what it the percentage of the specific sequence detected by PCR when compared to the entire genomic sequence?

The specific sequences targeted by PCR tests for COVID-19 represent a small fraction of the virus's entire genome.The SARS-CoV-2 virus has a genome of about 30,000 bases (the individual units of the RNA).PCR tests for this virus might target sequences that are around 100 to 200 bases long.So, the PCR targets represent less than 1% of the total genomic sequence of the virus.Does this help you understand the selective nature of PCR testing in relation to the virus's entire genome?

Can the specific sequences targeted by PCR be found in other things which are not the covid virus?

The specific sequences targeted by PCR tests for COVID-19 are chosen because they are unique to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and should not be found in other viruses or in human DNA.This is crucial for ensuring the test is specific and doesn't give false positive results.However, no test is 100% perfect, and there can occasionally be false positives due to contamination or other errors, but these are relatively rare.Does this information ease any concerns you might have about the specificity and accuracy of PCR tests for COVID-19?

"The specific sequences targeted by PCR tests for COVID-19 are chosen because they are unique to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and should not be found in other viruses or in human DNA."

"should not" or "defenitely not"

The sequences targeted by PCR tests are chosen because they are unique to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, meaning they should definitely not be found in other viruses or human DNA under normal circumstances.This is based on our current understanding and the extensive genetic databases we have.However, biology can be complex and unpredictable, and while it's highly unlikely, we cannot completely rule out the possibility of such a sequence occurring elsewhere.Does this subtle uncertainty change your perspective on the challenges involved in creating highly specific tests?

Can I pay to have my own samples genemically sequenced if I want to?

Yes, you certainly can.There are many companies and laboratories that offer genomic sequencing services for a fee.These services can range from whole genome sequencing, where your entire DNA is sequenced, to more specific tests, like sequencing the genome of a specific virus in a sample.Keep in mind, though, these services can be pricey and the interpretation of the data can be complex.Does the availability of personal genomic sequencing services make you more curious about your own genetic information and what it might reveal?

Besides the first cases of the virus that Chinese scientists isolated the virus from patients and sequenced its genome, are there any other times this was done?  Did an american laboratory also do this or only china?

After Chinese scientists first sequenced the genome of the COVID-19 virus, many other laboratories around the world have also sequenced the virus.This global effort is important for tracking the spread and evolution of the virus.In the United States, for instance, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), along with other research labs, have been conducting ongoing genomic surveillance of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.Does knowing about this global effort to continually sequence and monitor the virus change your perception of the scientific response to the pandemic?

What labs have done this?  There is no evidence that any lab has ever isolated the virus.

Numerous laboratories around the world have isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is a critical step for sequencing its genome and studying the virus.For instance, beyond the initial isolation by Chinese scientists, labs in many other countries, including the United States, Australia, and many European countries, have successfully isolated the virus.The CDC in the United States, for example, isolated the virus from the first reported cases in the U.S.and has made it available to the scientific community for research.Does knowing this clarify any misconceptions about the isolation and study of the SARS-CoV-2 virus?

"The CDC in the United States, for example, isolated the virus from the first reported cases in the U.S.

and has made it available to the scientific community for research."

I don't think this is correct.  is there a scientific paper that proves this?

There exists multiple scientific literature and resources that detail the isolation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.For example, a paper titled "A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019" published in the New England Journal of Medicine by Zhu et al., in February 2020 describes the isolation of the virus.Also, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provides detailed protocol on their website for laboratories to isolate the SARS-CoV-2 virus.Given this, does it help solidify your understanding of how the virus was isolated and studied?

can we talk more about this paper becuase it's hard to understand.

Absolutely, let's break it down.The paper by Zhu et al.documents the initial appearance of the COVID-19 virus in Wuhan, China.The researchers discovered a new virus in samples taken from patients who were sick with a mysterious pneumonia.They isolated the virus from these patients and studied its genetic material - this is the "novel coronavirus" part of the title.They found that the virus is part of the coronavirus family, hence the name, and that it was distinct from any previously known viruses in this family.They also noted its similarity to some coronaviruses found in bats, which led to further research on possible origins of the virus.Doing such a dissection of scientific papers often helps clarify dense information.Does this simpler explanation make the findings of the paper clearer to you?

ok great.  I found the paper and I was able to download the whole .pdf file.

just so we are on the same page, is this the correct paper?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092803/pdf/NEJMoa2001017.pdf

Yes, that's the correct paper!The paper, "A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019," published in the New England Journal of Medicine by Zhu et al., is one of the fundamental studies conducted early in the COVID-19 pandemic.It describes the initial identification and genetic sequencing of the virus that causes COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2.As you read through the paper, are there specific sections or terms that you find confusing or would like to discuss further?

how many infected patients were used in  the study?

According to the paper you provided, the study initially involved a total of 7 patients who were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with pneumonia of unknown cause.Bronchoalveolar-lavage (BAL) fluid samples, which are collected from the lungs, were obtained from these patients for further analysis.These samples played a crucial role in the initial identification of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.Does it surprise you that the initial identification of this virus came from such a small group of patients?

only 7?

Yes, the initial discovery of the SARS-CoV-2 virus came from analyzing samples from a small group of patients.This is not uncommon in the early stages of investigating a new disease.By studying these initial cases, scientists were able to quickly identify the new virus, sequence its genome, and develop tests for it.This work provided the foundation for the much larger scale studies and public health measures that followed.How does this context of the early stages of the pandemic impact your understanding of how scientists respond to emerging diseases?

did all 7 patients have the entire genomic sequence detected from the whole virus?

The paper doesn't specify that the entire genomic sequence was detected in all 7 patients.What the researchers did was to isolate the virus from one patient's sample, and they sequenced the full genome of this isolated virus.This sequence was then used as a reference to develop a diagnostic test, which was used to confirm the presence of the virus in the other patients.Does the method of using one patient's viral sequence as a reference for diagnosing others raise any questions for you about the process?

so they only detected to full genomic sequence of one person.  is that really true?

Based on the information provided in the paper, it appears that the full genomic sequence of the virus was initially obtained from one patient's sample.This is a common approach in virology; obtaining a full viral genome sequence is a complex process, so initially, it's often done on a small number of samples, or even a single sample.That sequence is then used as a reference to develop diagnostic tests, which can confirm the presence of the virus in other patients without needing to sequence the virus from each individual.Does it surprise you that a single patient's sample can provide such crucial information for understanding a new virus?

yes I'm very surprised.  did the other 6 people not have covid?  

The other six patients in the study were also diagnosed with COVID-19.After the virus was isolated and its genome sequenced from the first patient, a diagnostic test was developed based on that sequence.This test was used to detect the presence of the virus in the other patients' samples, confirming that they also had COVID-19.Remember, once the virus's genomic sequence is known, you don't have to sequence the whole virus from every patient to diagnose them.Does this clarify how the diagnostic process works once the genomic sequence of a virus is known?

i thought that genomic sequencing can do multiple samples at once.  is this incorrect?

Genomic sequencing can indeed process multiple samples at once, depending on the technology used.However, when a new virus is first identified, scientists often start by sequencing the viral genome from a single isolated sample to understand its genetic makeup.Once they have this reference sequence, they can then use it to identify the same virus in other samples without needing to sequence the entire genome from each sample.This approach is more time and cost-effective for diagnostic purposes.Does this help clarify the role of genomic sequencing in both initial virus identification and subsequent diagnostic testing?

why did they do just one patient instead of all 7?  that doesnt' make sense.  how much does genomic sequencing cost?

In the early stages of investigating a new disease, scientists need to quickly identify the causative agent.Sequencing the genome of the virus from one patient's sample allows them to do this.Once they have that genome sequence, they can use it as a reference to check for presence of the same virus in other patients' samples using methods like PCR.As for cost, it can vary widely.A few years ago, sequencing a whole genome could cost several thousand dollars, but advances in technology have been rapidly decreasing that cost.However, it's still significantly more expensive and time-consuming than a PCR test.Does this give you a better understanding of the balance scientists must strike between thoroughness and efficiency in an urgent situation like a disease outbreak?

how long did it take the scientists to do the whole genomic sequence?  

how much does this process cost approximately?

The exact time and cost to sequence the entire genome of a virus can vary widely depending on several factors, including the type of sequencing technology used, the size of the genome, and the quality of the sample.However, with modern sequencing technologies, it's possible to sequence a viral genome within a few days once the virus has been isolated.As for cost, it's difficult to give an exact number as it's dependent on the aforementioned factors, but it can range from a few hundred to a few thousand dollars per sample.Does this time and cost estimation provide some perspective on the resources involved in genomic sequencing?

"a few thousand dollars" in nothing in comparison to all the money society has spent on covid testing in general right?  can you give me a rough estimate on the total cost society has paid for testing every other regualr covid patient since that first guy in china was tested?

The amount of money spent on COVID-19 testing globally is substantial but difficult to estimate precisely, due to the various types of tests, the differing costs in different countries, and the sheer number of tests conducted.As of early 2022, over 3 billion COVID-19 tests have been reported globally.At an average cost of $20-$200 per PCR test, the total cost could be in the tens to hundreds of billions of dollars.This doesn't take into account the additional costs of rapid antigen tests, testing infrastructure, personnel, and other related expenses.Considering these potential costs, can you see why methods like PCR are preferred for large-scale testing, even after the initial genomic sequencing has been done?

No, "Considering these potential costs", it seems very illogical to only test 1 person with the genomic sequencing test in comparison to the billions of other people who were often forced to be tested.  

It might seem counterintuitive, but there are good reasons for this approach.Firstly, once

(3RD SPACE OUT)

are you ok? I keep getting spaced out error messages.

Go deeper

Finish entry

Interactive