Talk Dirty to Me

Defining "Controlled Opposition" in 2023.

It's fair to say that "controlled opposition" and "conspiracy theorist" are both controversial phrases which are being overused in public discourse these days.  Each phrase has taken on its own new modern interpretation despite their literal definitions implying otherwise.   

Whether we like it or not, both terms, (along with their evolved modern meanings), have managed to become permanently implanted in the English language, and they're not going away anytime soon.

Having been unfairly characterized and mocked relentlessly for decades, the modern "conspiracy theorists" of 2023 have pretty much accepted and even embraced this disparaging label, and that's the correct thing to do at this stage of the game.  

We own this, and that's just how it's gonna be.

Although there are a few literary references citing the use of the phrase "conspiracy theorist" before JFK's assassination, this term was most certainly popularized by the main stream press during that same time in the late 1960s, (and would have it's 2nd growth spurt around the dawn of the internet, especially from 09/11/01 onward).

While there is no concrete proof that the CIA was directly responsible for promoting and popularizing this term, the infamous CIA Document - 1035-960 - "Countering Criticism of the Warren Report" raises a lot of plausible possibilities based on the evidence it provides.  Here's a little snippet for quick reference:

As a modern-day self-proclaimed "conspiracy theorist", I would simplistically define this term in the present time as:

An individual who objectively questions any given narrative presented by the establishment.

The establishment is usually the government, the main stream legacy media, powerful corporate entities, or some united combination of all three.

We're not Snopes or CNN, but perhaps their modern simplistic definition of a "conspiracy theorist" might be:

An individual who objectively irrationally questions any given narrative the obvious truth presented by the establishment experts. 

Objectively speaking, "any given narrative" and "the obvious truth" are both speculative phrases thus far.   

The "obvious truth" presented by the establishment could most certainly be 100% correct: (a triangle has 3 sides), or rather, the real truth.  

Conversely, the "obvious truth" could also be 100% wrong, (Hunter Biden's laptop does not exist), and therefore, the "obvious truth" presented by the establishment was indeed just "any given narrative", or rather, a false narrative in this case.

THE ESTABLISHMENT proclaims the "obvious" truth "needs" no investigation. 

"The Conspiracy Theorist" proclaims the real truth fears no investigation.  

One of the key traits that differentiates the modern "conspiracy theorists" from the modern "controlled opposition" is the fear of investigation.  Savvy "conspiracy theorists" can smell this fear from 1/2 way across the Earth.  

Del Bigtree reeks...does he not?  

The modern definition of the term "controlled opposition" is trickier to explain, and the evolving overall meaning of this phrase is still being hotly debated currently online.

Some individuals who've been flippantly accused of being a "controlled opposition agent" or a "psyop" are greatly offended by such claims, because they are absolutely certain that they don't fit the old fashion standard definition of what "controlled opposition" historically implies:

An entity hired by the establishment to deceive the public, by pretending to oppose a selected portion of the establishment's presented narrative while covertly supporting it as a whole.

More simply put:  Controlled Opposition = Paid Actor

The key word here is "paid".  

The establishment, (whether it be the government, the medical industry, or some other type of powerful entity in control), is the payer.

Anyone accused of being "controlled opposition", (guilty or not), can always simply, confidently, and logically refute this claim by stating,

"You're calling ME controlled opposition?!  Show me the evidence!  The burden of proof is ON YOU to support YOUR claim!  So unless you can show me the documented bank transaction from the government, (or whoever-the-fuck-else you think paid me), then you ain't got shit!"

And they'd be absolutely right. 

Our claim that "they" are "controlled opposition" is unsubstantiated, because we lack the unequivocal evidence required to satisfy the burden of proof, therefore, our claim is not proven to be true.

And here's where it gets tricky....

Unless we have the far-reaching totalitarian governmental powers to randomly seize private citizens' bank statements on a whim, (with the hope speculation of finding some kind of "controlled opposition payments"), then we'll never be able to obtain the kind of unequivocal documented evidence necessary to fulfill the burden of proof adequately enough to substantiate our claim!  

Even if we did have this super-surprise-auditing type of power, then unless we also have an army of spies following our "target" around in question, it would be next to impossible to catch the alleged "agent" accepting a suitcase full of cash in some dark dusty "basement" of a random Members Only Pizzeria Pegasus Museum.

So...if someone really is a hired "controlled-op", then they will always be able to deny all claims with confidence and impunity.  They fully understand that it's not legally possible for regular private citizens to "find" the necessary evidence to unequivocally prove their hypothesis.  

The truth community can't audit Del Bigtree's bank transactions, and we can't have hidden ninja-cameramen stalking him 24/7 hoping to get footage of him accepting wads of cash from the men in black.  

And that's a really good thing! 

Del Bigtree deserves the same privacy rights, (as well as the same "innocent until proven guilty" default standards), that we all deserve in a free society.  (This is not to proclaim that our "free" society actually respects this ideal to the extent that it should).  

So unless Bigtree willingly admits that he's being paid by Big Pharma to "act" the way he acts, then we've really got no concrete proof that he's a "controlled opposition agent", and we must admit that our claim is still a speculative unproven hypothesis based on circumstantial evidence only.  (Del's also smart enough to not leave his laptop at the local computer repair shop and then forget about it!)

Tom Cowan's objective/scientific approach to this dilemma back in November of 2022 is meaningful and makes sense, (Quote begins on the 53rd minute) :

If the unequivocal "proof" Tom speaks of were to actually exist for any given suspected "controlled opposition" entity, then we'd never be able to find it, and that's for a damn good reason.  

The Right to Privacy is much more important than forcefully compelling Del Bigtree, (or anyone for that matter), to cough up their bank statements under these circumstances.  Conspiracy theorists and controlled-ops who both wholly encompass the "truth community" must understand that this type of concrete proof is next to impossible for anyone to obtain...and that's part of the game!  

However, the totality of circumstantial evidence surrounding many of these shady entities in question warrants legitimate speculation and inquiry from the general public.  

We have a right to claim what we believe based on the facts and circumstances that we can easily observe. 

Just as "they" also have the same right to make speculative claims about all of us "conspiracy theorists"...and believe me, they execute that right way more boldly, irrationally, and relentlessly in comparison!  

In a free society, everyone has the right to speculate...for any reason...(including Igor).

But would that also mean that everyone has the merit to justify their speculations?

What's this "totality of circumstantial evidence" which supposedly "merits" legitimate speculation of these alleged "controlled opposition agents" to begin with?  

The 6 Defining Traits Totality of Circumstantial Evidence Which Defines Modern Controlled Opposition: 

(Disclaimer: This is 100% according to Boostershots….chill bro.)

Trait #1. "They" proudly proclaim to be part of the "truth community". 

Wait hold up, this would also include Boostershots...right?

(Correct, this does include Boostershots, as well as the leaders of Team No-Virus.  But it's the totality of circumstantial evidence which supports the merit.  We've only checked off one box so far.)

Trait #2. "They" publicly support fierce opposition to a selected portion of any given narrative presented by the establishment, while covertly supporting the same narrative as a whole. 

("Covid shots are bad, but viruses are good lucrative real.")  

Trait #3. "They" FEAR scientific investigation.  They resort to illogical reasoning in order to "justify" the abandonment of the pursuit of truth.  They often project nervousness, agitation, or even hostility whenever this abandonment is pointed out by others in open debate.  Significant changes in body language and personality can be observed whenever they are challenged. 

Ever watch Bigtree in slo-mo? 

Trait #4. "They" knowingly have the power to deny all claims of being "paid" by the establishment, because any damning financial connections could never be legally or unequivocally exposed by the public.

However, it must be noted that there are many scenarios where "they" might not even realize that they're being paid to act like "controlled opposition agents" to begin with!  

These are the types of individuals who might get truly offended if they are ever flippantly labeled as "controlled ops" by other people trolls online.

For Example, there is this little Substack blog called...

(Actually, we're going to stick to a hypothetical example instead).  Because if we keep over-rocking this boat, then we'll probably capsize!

Let's suppose a hypothetical semi-awakened pediatrician might have successfully persuaded many clueless parents to resist injecting their children with toxic covaids-clot-shots.  

Terrific!

Yet this same pediatrician still obediently injected those same kids with a 3rd dose of HPV-voodoo-juice, (while happily billing the parent's health insurance provider for another $355 without even thinking twice about it!)  

The key word in Trait #4 is "knowingly".  Your kid's "semi-dope" pediatrician isn't really "controlled opposition", but rather, "Dr Semidope" is still unknowingly controlled, or at the very least, unknowingly partially controlled. 

Dr Semidope stopped some of the needles, but not all of the needles, (and she always cashes that "semi-dope" paycheck every other week!)  This pediatrician still "covertly supports the establishment's narrative as a whole", (Trait #2), but does so unknowingly.  

Perhaps "Dr Semidope" could be thought of as a "Controlled Conspiracy Theorist". 

However, there is a much more common disparaging useful term for this type of person, regardless of either their partial or nonexistent awareness of the total real truth: 

"useful idiot".  

(Or perhaps in the case of Dr Semidope, a "semi-useful idiot".)  

Full disclosure:  I was the medical establishment's Club Satan's "useful idiot" for decades before the Covid scam went down.  Like many others, I truly believed in all aspects of "the germ theory" until those dreadful lockdowns happened which gave me hours upon hours of unexpected free time to research this scam on my own...  

Speaking of time, there's only so much time which can be used for the endless pursuit of knowledge and truth.  No human could possibly seek out all the real answers to every "conspiracy theory" over 10 100 1000 ????? lifetimes.  

Therefore, I must admit that I still am a "useful idiot" regarding most of the other hidden truths of this "world", (let alone the totality of all of the aspects behind the fraud of "germ theory" itself, even though I've become solely obsessed with it over the last 3 years).  

By default, everyone is a "useful idiot" when everything is taken into account.  We'd be arrogant to deny this reality, no matter how derogatory this term might sound. 

Hopefully this little Socrates quote doesn't come across as...arrogant.

We're ALL useful idiots...because we're all imperfect humans with limited amounts of time...kill me.

However, do not despair!  Our particular group of humans "useful idiots" also happens to be the conspiracy theorists!  

And it's the Conspiracy Theorists who don't fear investigation!  EVER!  

That's what separates us from the rest!  

Nothing is ever "not open to debate", everything is always on the table.

So in order to check off Box #4 from our list of traits which defines the modern controlled opposition, "Dr Semidope" would also have to knowingly be in that position, (and knowingly be compensated for it too).  

"Partially Controlled Conspiracy Theorist" "Useful Idiot" does NOT equal "Controlled Opposition".

We've previously established that the burden of proof required to substantiate Trait #4 is practically impossible to accomplish, (unless Dr Semidope or whoever else were to make an honest tell-all confession).  

We would really need to have Lestat's mind-reading powers to obtain this evidence all on our own, if it were to even exist... 

We all know that Vampires don't exist...

No Lestat, it doesn't work like that, it works like this:

The burden of proof is always on you to prove that vampires do exist since you’re the one making the claim. We've already talked about this way too much bro!  Seriously?!

"Dr Semidope" writes a small blog on Substack called, "The Anonymous Diaries of an Awakened Pediatrician ".  

This little blog details her brave endeavors to help uninformed parents to resist injecting their children with triple shots of mRNA-snake-juice under the looming threat of losing her medical license in the process.  

After all, Dr Semidope has mountains of medical school debt to pay off, and she definitely can't afford to just lose her "career".  So perhaps she has chosen to remain "anonymous" for the same "reasons" as "A Midwestern Doctor" has chosen to remain anonymous...

Perhaps...

(More about anonymity later)

There are some glaring differences between "Dr Semidope" and "A Midwestern Doctor". 

Dr Semidope's Substack blog only has 33 subs, (and 2/3rds of them are her family members who don't even read it!)  

During Dr Semidope's limited spare time off after work, she struggles with multiple dating websites before giving up and consuming a tub of strawberry Häagen-Daz while watching Deep Space Nine reruns with her beloved pet cat. 

(It was the cat who psychically caused this whole depressing situation to happen in the first place, and you really can't blame the cat, as it's just in the cat's nature to be like this).

Even if Dr Semidope managed to cut out all of the mindless distractions in her life, she would still have a very limited amount of time to do any more research, (let alone crank out more Substack articles).  

Dr Semidope ponders the evils of "mRNA technology" with the assistance of a sativa joint fatter than her pinky finger.  

She idolizes Steve Kirsch and Igor Chudov RFK Jr and Sasha Latypova as anti-mRNA super-heroes.

She melted like an Eskimo Pie on an overheated laptop after Robert Malone "liked" one of her comments on his Substack.

Dr Semidope became really discouraged when 3 rando-trolls suddenly claimed that she was a "controlled opposition loser" on her little Substack blog, (and these assholes didn't bother to provide any evidence to back up their snark and effortless accusations)...more ice-cream!  

So it's certainly fair to say that "Dr Semidope's" frustration and offense are understandable, as she's definitely not a "controlled opposition agent", (despite a few unproven claims being alleged against her from rando-trolls).

Dude, that story is boring AF!  And it's freaking hypothetical!  Boostershots has already claimed that REAL people like The Midwestern Doctor, El Gato Malo, and a whole bunch of others ARE "controlled opposition"!  Like multiple times!  What gives!?  Why are YOU such an asshole?!

Slow down girl...

Dr Semidope only checks off 2 out of 6 boxes so far...

This "checklist approach" to reach a scientific conclusion works the exact same way that ADHD AIDS did in the late 80s...  

For example:  In 1988, a drug-free straight married Christian white woman who doesn't like to party came to the doctor complaining of "hemorrhoids and fatigue".  The doctor diagnosed her with....hemorrhoids.  

Why?  

Because only 2 out of 6 boxes were checked...

wait a minute...

that's actually 2 out of 9 boxes...

1. Drug use, 2. Sexuality, 3. Marital Status, 4. Religion, 5. Race, 6. Gender, 7.Promiscuity, 8. Hemorrhoids, 9. Fatigue...

Whatever.

Contrariwise, in 1988, a meth-addicted unmarried non-religious gay black man who loves to party came to the same doctor complaining of "hemorrhoids and fatigue".  The Doctor diagnosed him with..."AIDS".  

(9 out of 9 boxes checked!)

Not sure if this is helping or hurting my argument? 

Perhaps I should've used a different example?

like a real one?  

Whatever!

So we're back to our list of nine six traits that define the modern controlled opposition. 

Will "Dr Semidope" check anymore boxes on our list?  

Let's find out!

Trait #5. "They" ignore, suppress, or outright censor public discourse objecting to the protected "narrative as a whole", despite clear and documented growing public interest which logically compels otherwise.  Censorship can be accomplished directly, (like blocking opposing views within their own platforms they control), or indirectly, (by influencing and/or pressuring 3rd parties to do their censoring for them).  

Remember, THEY want to censor US.

WE don't want to censor THEM.

Our hypothetical overworked/indebted pediatrician which we named "Dr Semidope" has zero reasons to censor others on her own platform, (aside from sexually aggressive comments or the typical "Make $420/hour while working from home!").  

Dr Semidope hates censorship because she's already witnessed the terrible damage it has ultimately caused to her innocent young patients, and therefore, she logically believes that all good "conspiracy theorists" must also be hardcore anti-censorship, just like her. 

Now let's suppose Frances Leader were to scientifically challenge some of Dr Semidope's partially misguided views in the comment section of an article titled: 

"Covid Vaccines Kill, Polio Vaccines Save".

If this hypothetical scenario were to actually happen, then Dr Semidope should be bewildered at worst and intrigued at best, and that's because if Dr Semidope was truly an objective "conspiracy-minded noob", (who had only recently discovered the real truth about the dangers of the" mRNA injections"), then there's no logical reason for Dr Semidope to censor or go "full-on Jordan Peterson" towards Frances Leader...just because Frances provided some "new" evidence which compels a deeper dive into the fraud of the "germ theory" itself.  ("new" from Dr Semidope's perspective).

Could we say the same thing would happen with Dr Mercola? Or Robert Malone? Or el gato malo? 

If Dr Semidope was truly objective, she would NOT fear investigation, she would welcome it.  

If Dr Semidope was truly objective, she would NOT censor Frances Leader, she would welcome more information.   

Therefore, Dr Semidope stopped watching Deep Space Nine reruns and used that extra spare time to dive deeper into the "germ theory" rabbit hole instead.  She became so inspired that she decided to smuggle out a bunch of "vaccines" from her pediatric clinic so she could start doing her own controlled experiments on her beloved pet cat.  

She started a new Substack blog called, 

"Dr Semidope Dope Dopes Her Cat - Secret Experiments from an Anonymous Pediatrician."  

This new blog became popular for all the wrong reasons, but a serendipitous romantic connection was made with one of her new commenters who also happened to live in the same shitty city...  

And so the old cat moved out, 

the new boyfriend moved in, 

and Dr Semidope's little Substack blog melted away...

like an Eskimo Pie on an overheated laptop. 

Trait #6. "They" have an easy “Mate In One” opportunity that would immediately resolve the central controversy in question, yet this simple solution is illogically avoided...

consistently, 

continuously, 

ridiculously ludicrously.   

(Especially for these dudes with boat-loads of money who don't have any "normal-people-problems" to deal with anymore....this trait really shoulda been number 1 on this list.)

Suppose we're in the audience of a grandmaster-level chess tournament.  

We're witnessing a brilliant first round end-game between 2 old pros, and our home-team player now has a "Mate in One" opportunity on his next final move.  

It's an easy one!  

But for some "strange reason", after playing a really smart chess game from the get-go, our home-team "pro" doesn't seem to "see" this ridiculously ludicrously easy finishing move.  WTF?  

And so the game keeps going...

There's still another twist...  This chess tournament permits audience members to "blurt out" hints to the players during the matches!  

What?! That doesn't make any sense!

Correct. It doesn't make any sense. Why would anyone ever want to participate in this bizarre stupid hypothetical chess tournament to begin with?  

Because this is how things actually work inside the Chess Kolosseum of the Kovid Klown Kingdom.  You really don't have a choice in the matter.

Billions of enthusiastic kommon people klowns regularly tune into these "chess tournaments".  They've been konditioned since birth to simply just accept that this is the way things are.  

"They're pigs in human clothing".

As the tournament progresses, some of the more astute "klowns" begin to observe that a specific group of "grandmasters" keep "missing" easy mate in one opportunities...

consistently, 

continuously, 

ludicrously, 

even as millions of these "more astute" klowns are all blurting out in unison: 

"Mate in One! Mate in One! YOU"VE GOT MATE IN ONE BRO!!!!" 

Some astute klowns also notice a 2nd pattern: 

This strange group of "grandmasters" only seem to "fail" to "mate in one" against a certain few opponents, but not all of the opponents....  

Why are these grandmasters "tanking" certain games on purpose?  

Do they really not "see" the easy finishing move? 

Or do they really just not want to win?

DELETED SCENE: (OUR BOOSTERSHOTS EDITORIAL DIVISION HAS BEEN FORCED TO INTERVENE FOR THE GREATER GOOD).

Now let's briefly illustrate "Trait #6" of the controlled opposition much more concisely soberly using some "real-life" examples.   

We've chosen 5 very popular alleged "controlled opposition agents" along with a respective "mate in one move" which would instantly negate any and all of the accusatory clowns' cacophonous claims.

CONTROLLED OP:         "MATE IN ONE" SOLUTION

Del Bigtree:                        Invites the leaders of Team No virus on his "show".

Elon Musk:                         Allows everyone back on Twitter.

RFK jr:                               Requests a special 2 hour interview with...Jon Rappaport.

Tucker Carlson:                 Releases all of the J6 surveillance footage to the public.

Steve Kirsch:                     Accepts No-Virus Challenge.

Mike Yeadon:                    Funds the No-Virus Challenge.

As simplistically demonstrated, every "player" listed above has a ridiculously ludicrously obvious "Mate In One" move that would effectively "disprove" any and all "claims" made by the plebeian public that they just might be a... 

"controlled opposition agent".

But why is Steve Kirsch crossed out for Mike Yeadon?

Great question!  

Simple answer:  While Steve has always had this easy "mate and one" solution in his back pocket, he's gotten too old, too tired, too predictable, and just too plain boring to be relevant at this point.  We've already beaten that game, and it's really just no fun to play anymore!  (Maybe Steve will change our minds and do something exciting for a change, but I'm not really counting on it!)  

"For the record", Mike's still gotta lotta buzz!  And money.  And personality, (whether it's for real or just for the cameras).  Additionally, Mike will show up unannounced to your party at 4AM and he'll finish the rest of keg with you! 

What???? 

(We've matured enough to not make anymore huge promises or deadlines about up-coming Boostershots posts).

Tucker?  But he's already done so much good!  Just because Kevin McCarthy "said" he gave Tucker 44000 hours of J6 footage doesn't mean Tucker actually has it!  How can you actually claim that he's "controlled opposition" just because he couldn't show the footage!  He got fired!  What if Faux News STOLE the footage from him!  Maybe there's LEGAL issues you don't understand!  Maybe YOU'RE the one who's controlled opposition!  BOOSTERFAGGOT!

Chill bro.

Tucker still has mate in one, six ways to Sunday.  Even if all of the above were true, then Tucker Fucker could still easily "win this game".  

Yet "this game" keeps going...  

There's literally millions of "Former Fucker Fans" calling Tucker out as a "controlled op" at this point.  In less than five minutes, Tucker could get all of those disgruntled souls to start worshiping him once again, simply by issuing a brief statement along the lines of this:

It's fair to say Tucker Carlson is a "news grandmaster" in the context of our chess analogy described in trait #6.  It's also fair to say that after a hard fought chess journalism battle over this J6 fiasco, Fucker's got a "mate in one" opportunity...in his back pocket.  Additionally, millions people have been blurting out this obvious solution for him to "win the game"...for months!

Yet "the game" still goes on...

The public has a right to claim what we believe based on the facts and circumstances that we can easily observe. 

Tucker Carlson IS controlled opposition.

And we're back to our list of traits.   

7.  Using anonymity as a tool to unethically push their agenda.

NOPE!  

There's no Trait #7!  

(Besides, everything always needs to be the "number 6" while conducting business inside the Kovid Klown Kingdom...we don't make the rules, so go to hell).

But seriously,

How does "anonymity" even remotely prove that someone might be "controlled opposition" to begin with?  What's the "advantage" of being "anonymous" pertaining to this situation?  Where's the logic?

Are el gato malo and A Midwestern Doctor "controlled opposition" because they are both anonymous?  

Or are Boostershots and The Good Citizen "controlled opposition" because they are both anonymous?  

Are Robert Malone and Sasha Latypova NOT "controlled opposition" because they are NOT anonymous?  

Or are Sam Bailey and Christine Massey NOT "controlled opposition" because they are NOT anonymous?

We'll talk more about "anonymity" in an upcoming Boostershots post: "Fallen Angel".  

We've also got big plans to "Ride the Wind" with Elon Musk! 

Unfortunately Fortunately, we're cutting this current Boostershots post in half.  (It's for your health and safety).  

You're going to need at least 3 weeks of good sleep and sobriety in order to deal with  Part 2 of this post: "Talk Dirtier to Me".  

It's gonna get real belligerent, but only because it's absolutely necessary.  

We'll be further dissecting the importance of free speech, and we'll also be vivisecting a highly influential "doctor" who's sadly taken a wrong turn, (it's not Dr Michael Yeadon, we'll get to him later).

Ok, ok, ok!  We totally recognize that we actually HAVEN'T matured enough to not make anymore huge promises or deadlines about future up-coming Boostershots posts!

Stay tuned?

While it's not quite 4am yet, it's already 3:33AM...

We'll wrap it up with Rappoport:  

Damn bro...

It's certainly true that Jon's been exposing the fraud of germ theory before "Boostershots" even existed, (let alone crawling around in diapers)…

We're in full agreement with Jon's closing remarks:

Whether or not RFK jr. is "controlled opposition", (and I believe he is), all truth must be embraced, even if that means it can only be for "some things."   

Robert Kennedy is "a man who is doing VITAL work on killer vaccines" which "conspiracy theorists" are grateful for.

And on a much smaller scale, Igor Chudov is also a man doing VITAL work on at least one "killer vaccine", which "conspiracy theorists" are grateful for.  (The same could even be said for Steve Kirsch....ugh...kill me).

However, these individuals are "targets" whether they are "targeted" or not by any given members of the truth community.  

These "targets" have been placed in that position by their own doing, simply because of who they are, what they have already accomplished, and what they could accomplish in the future.

Would I prefer Robert Kennedy over Biden or Trump or DeSantis?  

When a malnourished starving person is offered the choice between shit sandwich, a vomit sandwich, a snot sandwich, or a Big Mac, then what's the best choice out of those 4 options? 

(Fresh fruit salad is not an option).

If a slave is offered the choice to live under a master who beats him daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly, then what's the best choice for that guy? 

(Freedom is not an option).

So I'm going with the Big Mac, because a presidential candidate who will expose the fraud of "germ theory" is not an option. 

(It must also be noted that I can't predict the future, and it is certainly possibly that I might regret the "Big Mac decision" and wished that I had "eaten" one of those other tasty "sandwiches" instead of McDonalds).

It's terribly unfortunate that Kennedy has actively chosen to ignore "the virus question", because he's certainly got a "mate in one" opportunity to ultimately crush the entire corrupt medical establishment save the world, should he chose to do so.

That may sound cheesy and juvenile, but you're reading Boostershots, not “Seymour Hersh”, so please…go to hell.  

Imagine the power anyone of us could have if we could somehow trade places with Kennedy, or Tucker, or Elon, even if it was just for a week....  

Maybe there is a "trait #7" after all…

Maybe RFK jr. and all these other "controlled opposition agents" knowingly understand that if they ever step out of line, then they'll suffer the same consequences that as JFK did...or worse.  It's quite terrifying to even think about it.

So perhaps "hammering Kennedy" IS "losing proposition" which would end up hurting Team No-Virus, rather than helping them... 

We don't want to end up shooting ourselves in the foot... 

We've got to play the best "game" that we can with the cards that we are dealt...

But does this mean that not hammering Kennedy is a winning proposition?

My gut instinct is telling me to lose the hammer and start up the chainsaw...but that's just me.

What if RFK jr. suddenly had a mental revelation and wanted to discuss the non-existence of viruses with Jon Rappoport...specifically.  

Perhaps Kennedy became ultra inspired after discovering some of Jon's unique writing for the very first time...perhaps something finally clicked in Kennedy's brain...

Suppose Jon gets a phone call from Kennedy's people asking him to set up a 2-hour special podcast to discuss Robert's newfound realization that viruses have never been proven to exist, and that the entire "germ theory" itself just might be a total fraud...

Would Jon respond to Kennedy's rep and say, 

"I don't care whether Kennedy agrees, I'd rather point out that Trump still tells people the Covid vaccines are great."

And we're back to REALITY... 

Kennedy appears to be actively ignoring the no-virus position.  

That sucks balls.

But more importantly, has Robert Kennedy made any conscious efforts to censor any public discourse concerning this most important issue of our time?  

I honestly don't know yet, as I must admit that I'm no Kennedy expert, and I haven't taken any time to research this possible angle in depth.  

What I do know, is that's it's still always better to be ignored than to be censored.   

The freedom of speech is inextricably linked to Team No-Virus.  

Rappoport's had a shit-ton of influence on this Boostershots blog, so of course I hope we haven't pissed him off too much, as we really look up to him and all the great work that he's accomplished.  However, we must also recognize that these "Boostershots" are highly toxic, perhaps even a "losing proposal".   

So we're gonna have to try end this thing on a really positive note.  I've lost the time and energy to research exactly what Jon said and when he said this, so I'm strictly going off my own hazy recollection for this final somewhat recent Rappaport "quote".

While referring to certain assholes attempting to censor other people, Jon was saying that for anyone who attempts to silence others, then he's going "Full Sluggo"on them…or something.  

(...really hope I'm remembering this at least somewhat correctly...)

Attention FBI agents!!!  "Full Sluggo" is just an artistic expression!  It implies strong literary criticism, not a "threat of violence", nor does it imply a direct "threat" to barge into a nice family's home with a gaggle of heavily armed glow-in-the-dark-faggots who end up shooting the family puppy!

Regardless of my opinions and my hazy memory, I've been successfully influenced mind-controlled by Jon, so please stay tuned for "Talk Dirtier To Me", because we're definitely going FULL SLUGGO in that post.

P.S. Wanna get away?  

Perhaps you've been over-saturating your brain with a little too much scientific research or complex mind-bending "conspiracy theory" content lately?  

If this is the case, then please consider bending your brain with Kill la Kill instead.  (Please watch in original Japanese, with English subtitles).  A dubbed version is also available, but it's poison...DON'T EVER DO THAT!  (Strong advice from an anime purist).

I'm assuming this anime series is probably a little too esoteric juvenile for most readers in this corner of the internet to be aware of.  (And probably why zero readers "got" the Christine/Peggy - Ryuco/Satsuki picture referenced in our previous article, "Nothing But a Good Time").

Kill la Kill is an exceptionally creative critique of fascism...

Kill la Kill unapologetically exemplifies the inherit strengths and weaknesses of masculine and feminine energy, as well as their synergy, (which is something that TV shows never do anymore). 

Kill la Kill tells the truth about some things, and doesn't tell the truth about other things.  (Because you can't be on Netflix or Hulu if you tell too much truth).     

I'm recommending this anime for the over-exhausted "truther" in need of something edgy racy fun ridiculous ludicrous different...especially if you're in need of a mental vacation away from the English Language...

There's many thought provoking layers to it...layers which would be especially intriguing for any "conspiracy theorist" to ponder with a sativa joint fatter than your pinky finger.