el gato mallophaga

The Cat's Officially Outta the Bag. I'm a Germ Believer Again! Get Ready to Rock Out With Your Koch Out!

germs are real. 

An overlooked scientific study conducted in 2012 unequivocally proves the existence of a replication-competent obligate parasite that spreads disease from host to host via natural modes of exposure.       

(That’s Fancy Feast science language which means: like a virus…)

The contagious nature and host-to-host transmission of these microscopic pathogens were proven beyond any reasonable doubt by performing repeatable experiments which adhered to The Scientific Method AND satisfied Koch's Postulates.

A small team of five scientists were easily able to isolate these particles, grow more of them in a pure culture medium, and then induce a new infection by transferring those particles to another healthy host organism which previously had no signs of any infection before!  

Speaking of results, controlled experiments have also proven that social distancing is tremendously effective at stopping the spread of this terrible disease!  

How did Team No Virus miss this study?  

Where have they been for the last 10 years?!   

Boostershots’s "Virus Denialism" has fizzled out after a brief five-month phase, but I can easily explain the root cause of why this temporary denialism ever happened in the first place! 

You know what was really bothering us before?  

Germ Believers Hate Koch. 

They're always dissing Koch or making fun of Koch, or claiming that Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch isn't really important anymore. I never understood why they would always avoid Koch’s Postulates as if they were Poison. During the ever increasing amount of new scientific discussions and intense debates concerning the existence of viruses, whenever Koch gets thrown into to the foray, the Germ Believers go nuts.

So even though I'm back to “believing” in germs once again, I also firmly believe that it's still in the Scientific Community's best interest to be continuously exposed to Koch on a routine basis, because this serves as a constant reminder of the importance of adhering to the Scientific Method.  This stuff really can't be reposted enough times on social media. 

The Big Pharma Vax Pushing Media Giants are very complicit in Koch suppression.  There's a coordinated effort to smear scientists or journalists who dare to illuminate the importance of Koch's Postulates.  Bummer.

(Note to my Dear Leaders of the “Germ Believist Movement”: It’s 2023, and you’ve really got to stop using this “out of date” phrase if you want new free thinkers to take you seriously. Over the last few years, most of the the general public has come to the solid understanding that “fact check” essentially just means, “Truth is right over here!” Whenever an ultra-noob “conspiracy theorist” sees the phrase “fact check”, they get that same kind of “ah-ha satisfaction” that a broke meth addict gets when he finds an old hidden stash he thought he lost a few months back... We can’t give those pesky conspiracy theorists any more soft pitches!)

Contempt for Koch is all too common on social media as well…

The good news is that not all of the Germ Believers are like this, including myself!

A hand full of unknown virologists entomologists finally fulfilled Koch's Postulates by conducting controlled experiments in this very important Madagascan Mallophaga Study from 2012, proving that germs are real indeed.  (A link to this study will be provided later on in Part 3 of this article...because it won't be any fun if I just let the other cat out of the bag right now!)

We'll first take a look at some necessary background information which will provide the basis and storyline for the analysis we're about to present, but before we get in to too deep, I must admit there is one more tiny detail that I "forgot" to mention....  

I had to remove a little "problematic" Fancy Fest Science Word from my opening statement, (which is totally ok because virologists do shit like this all the time! Everything is fine!)  Here's my opening statement once again:

“An overlooked scientific study conducted in 2012 unequivocally proves the existence of a replication-competent obligate parasite that spreads disease from host to host via natural modes of exposure.” 

Here's the original quote that I butchered plagiarized:

So we're really just talking about the "removal" of one silly little word...(or is it "redefining"?) Whatever.  This was all I needed to do in order to become a fully fledged Germ Believer once again!  (This minor “germ redefinition” is kind of like the minor difference between the in-silico genomic sequencing of the H1N1 bug when compared to the in-silico genomic sequencing of the SarsCov2 bug, it’s just another aspect of "Science" that most normal people aren't smart enough to understand :)

I'm not even doing anything that drastic!   Many of my Germ Believing friends are still pushing for the TOTAL REMOVAL of Koch from the Entire Body of Science!  (And they're also still vouching for these lame "scientific studies" which conduct “experiments” without the use of any controls!)  

WTF is Mallophaga?  "Bad Mouth?"  

Could this strange term refer to the way that arrogant "virologists" and pompous "health officials" communicate with the unawakened tax payers who are funding their lavish lifestyles?  Sure, that's certainly one correct interpretation.  Here's another:

All species of lice are specific to the one single animal that they can infect. (Additionally, different species of lice inhabit different places on the same animal’s body…chickens have 6 different species of lice, “inhabiting” the head, fluff, body, shaft and wings).

Those lice on your human head can’t “migrate”…down there…thank God for that! The lice on a monkey can never “cross over” to a new species like a “virus” supposedly can. An old unkept cat lady will never “get” cat lice from her sprawling Cat Kingdom, and more importantly, none of her cats would ever contract any human head lice from their lousy lousy master!

(not a typo…the word “lousy” can either mean “lame” or “full of lice” depending on how you pronounce this unique homograph).

In all seriousness, why aren't "virologists" more like entomologists?

Because Lice are REAL and "viruses" are imaginary.  It's really that simple.

Ok ok OK!  A logical free thinking person would be absolutely correct to immediately challenge this weird "virus" to lice comparison at a first glance. You might even say that we’re in 2 completely different ballparks!  And? So what are the glaringly key major differences between lice and "viruses"?

1. SIZE:   (Why does “size” really matter when it comes to "germs" anyway?) 

Adult cat lice can grow up to around 1.5 millimeters.  (Human head lice grow to about 4-5mm).  The Covid19 "virus" is claimed to be about 100 nanometers in diameter.  So that means that a cat louse is about 15,000 times longer than the diameter of a Covaids "virus" particle.   Aside from this huge difference in size, "germs" lice "spread" in a very similar host-to-host fashion that "viruses" are said to supposedly "spread".  The Coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) can grow up to 116 meters and the Dwarf Willow grows to only 1-6cm. One is 11,600 times taller than the other…but BOTH of them are still…trees.

2.  TEAM NO KILL: Lice are true parasites which do not "kill" the host like a "virus" supposedly "kills" a healthy living cell. 

This "premeditated cell murder" enacted by the "virus" is said to occur after the successful "highjacking" of the cell's healthy body in order to self replicate many more "viruses".  Your cells are supposedly tricked into becoming alien egg-like incubation machines working overtime until they burst open with a bunch of new baby fully grown adult viruses!  

Here's an example of the next closest thing found in nature that also does this specific type of reproduction:

If you're still willing to accept the fantasy of "viruses" as reality, then it's probably best to just keep ignoring the infinite amount of logical questions which arise about the "cell murdering" process of this mysterious killer nanoparticle that no one can find yet.

Why does the cell have to die?  

Wouldn't it be more realistic for the "virus" to treat your cell like the louse treats your head cat?

A louse can only live around 24-72 hours without a blood meal. 

So how long can a “VIRUS”… "live" outside the cat? 

Oh, that's right, I forgot.  "Viruses" aren't technically "alive"...right?  So do viruses seemingly live exist forever, kinda like a helium atom?  Or can lice viruses only "survive" for about "24 - 72 hours" if they are away from their host?

Why not 25-73 hours? 

(Remember the good old times when it used to be called “coronavirus” instead of “Covid19”?)

Whatever.

What does a “dead” virus that “didn’t survive” look like anyway? Are those “safe” to be around?

(All of the fake CGI pictures of viruses on the net are kinda like a perfect virus-version of the Statue of David. Are there “any out of shape” viruses? Can a virus “get old” and slow down or can it ever get “sick” in a sense? How does a virus die? Can it come back to life as a new variant or even a zombie virus?”)

How does that overpowered O.G. "Baby Daddy Virus" “break through” the healthy cell’s wall to begin with? 

How does it start making new baby viruses? 

How fast does it do this?

Once Baby Daddy Virus is firmly "in the cell", how many new viruses get made before the cell "bursts"?

Why can't all the new “Baby Viruses” just leave the same way that the "Big Baby Daddy Virus" politely and indiscreetly "entered" in the first place?  

What part of the virus(es) does/do the "bursting effect"?  

Does the previously healthy cell just get "exhausted" from all of that "virus making" and then "explode" on its own accord out of "fatigue"?  And if so, then...

WHY CAN’T WE EVER SEE A CELL EXPLODE?!

Where do all of these "viruses" get the energy to force the healthy cell's wall open, (both on its way in and on their way out)?

Does the virus secrete an enzyme or something toxic unicorn spit to break down the cell wall before it goes inside?  

Does the virus have a special pseudopod that kicks down the cell "door" from the inside?

Virus Worshipers have tons of "lousy" excuses, and the most common one is something along the lines of,

"Bro, viruses are way too small to see with an optical microscope!  You can SEE a "felicola subrostratus" with a fucking magnifying glass!  Go to hell!"  

Correct.  But you can certainly see a whole cell under a not-so-great optical microscope found in any of today's high school biology labs 4th grade classroom from the early 1980s...right?  Therefore, the top professional "scientists" of 2020 and beyond should certainly be able to SEE a whole cell "EXPLODE"... right? 

Look, we totally understand that those tiny little 100nm “alive but not really alive” "virus particles" are not “zoom-in-able” enough due to the mathematical limits of current optical microscope technology in real time. However, that enormous 7500nm "cell murder explosion" should be just as crystal clear as that crazy scene from Superman Part 3 when that evil corporate villain lady was forced to transition into a robot…(and this is at the same resolution from your crappy cable television in 1984!)  

So is Robot Woman “alive but not really alive”…like a virus?

Slow down girl! We’re going to ZOOM IN to a whole new world…together…at the finale of Part 3! Stay with me.

We observe all kinds of bad shit happening to real living cells in real time by using standard optical microscopes on the x1000, x1500 and x2000 magnification power levels, (despite other tiny bits and dots and specs and air bubbles which are also present, but too small or too fuzzy to accurately discern as well as we'd like to).  

I JUST WANNA SEE A CELL EXPLODE ALREADY!

Ok, let's play Devil's advocate.  Maybe viruses won't “explode” any cells unless they are left alone in their "natural habitat"?  (My old high school buddy used to have a catatonic pet python cramped inside a tiny terrarium way back in the day.  The stupid snake would never eat the mouse unless we gave it some "privacy", but if the snake was super hungry, then it would eventually eat the mouse right in front of us).   

Malaria don't need any freakin' “privacy” to act like malaria under the microscope!  

Do all of these viruses just get a little "shy" once they step foot on to the stage "slide"?  Or do viruses get Stage "Slide Fright"? (This is the most important link for this article, it really should have been included at the beginning. I forgot how rockin’ this Def Leppard song is).

BTW, the more I research malaria, the more questions I have about malaria.  (For those unaware, malaria is a tiny blood parasite, not a “virus”). The Leaders of Team No Virus should fully investigate and discuss malaria in depth with the truth community, as there's a shit ton of misconceptions and other weird things that we really don't understand about how these tiny parasites actually work.  Hopefully the Boostershots blog can address malaria in the future, but we're sticking with cat lice for the time being.  

Cat Lice don't make your cat’s head EXPLODE before moving onto another cat, because it’s not in the louse's best interest to "explode" the cat golden goose…

So aside from the louse's much larger size and lack of a murder protocol after reproduction replication is completed, these incredibly unique organisms “spread” in a very similar manner that imaginary contagious "GERMS" are said to spread.

When an infected bad cat with a heavy viral lousy load comes into direct fur-to-fur contact with another healthy cat, then the lice will "transmit" themselves to the new unlucky cat.  Like Tarzan swinging from vine to vine, the louse swings from one strand of cat fur to another, with miraculous strength and agility, (but there's no "jumping" 6 feet, or even 6 millimeters for that matter).  Lice can't jump like fleas can.  They can only crawl and "swing" really fast.  The viral lousy cat must nuzzle with another non-lousy cat or there will be no cat lice transmission.  If there isn't a new "vine" for Tarzan to grab hold of, then he's going to be isolated and "quarantined" along with that same “host tree”.  Social distancing actually works, if you want to stop the spread of lice.  

The contagious nature of lice transmission is well documented with proven results which can be reproduced in repeatable experiments, yet this cannot be done with "viruses".

Were the Virus Inventors heavily influenced mind-controlled by the many different kinds of horrifying yet real parasites of all shapes and sizes which have "plagued" humanity for all of human history? (Ancient Egyptians shaved their entire bodies just to get rid of the constant lice problems they had).  

Perhaps a better different analogy could be the comparison of "viruses" to a colony of red fire ants killing a much larger caterpillar, or a school of piranhas killing a much larger cow, or a pack of wolves killing a much larger moose.  These "killer" organisms just mentioned are all significantly smaller than the "hosts" that they end up killing.  

But are any of these "infected hosts" contagious to the other animals around them?  

What danger does a dying "wolf-infected moose" pose to another healthy moose?  

The "Game of Lice" could also be thought of as a "Game of Grooming".  (And no, not that kind of grooming).  Men who dressed in drag had very different objectives back in the 1980s).

Anyway, you'll typically find lice on elderly or malnourished cats who've allowed these nasty critters to grow big enough to reach the adult stage when they can start laying eggs all over the poor cat's fur.  A healthy cat can easily groom the little guys out early and often, (by licking its fur with its tongue), thereby causing any lice present to methodically die out because they'll never grow large enough to reproduce.  Lice are often found under a cat's collar or around the neck region because its a tough area for the cat to get to, (unless there is another cat around who's willing to lick the poor cat's lousy neck that's in question).  

You basically get 3 chances to "win" "The Game of Lice" before you "lose"!  (This goes for both humans and cats).  Humans can use a specialized lice comb which can be bought at any drug store for less than $10. Over the next week or so, (as the previously laid eggs will still keep hatching), you'll have to keep up with the persistent combing before it's "3 strikes molts and you're out!" While it's practically impossible to get rid of those nasty microscopic sticky-eggs, you've got unbeatable odds by grooming out the x2 nymph-stage lice and the x1 young adult louse before they can mature enough to start having orgies on your head, hence "The Circle of Lice"…

"Douse The Louse" is not the way!  Persistent grooming is the key, (not toxic chemicals)!  A human child with lice could douse their heads with POSION, (which doesn't work so well anymore because these "super lice" have become very resistant to all of those chemicals used over the last bunch of decades).  You’ll still end up having to comb out a combination of dead, 1/2 alive, and really pissed off super lice drenched in ivermectin or dimethicone slime. It's best to simply avoid all lice poisons and just groom meticulously comb your daughter's hair like any sensible primate should.  

But I guess I can't blame any parent who resorts to Poison out sheer of desperation.  The emotional stress and aggravation caused from dealing with your daughter's lice problem the natural way can be a real royal pain.  (There's really no excuse for boys...just shave their heads so they can get that shit over with already!  Long hair on men was just a temporary fad from the past!)  

Most of the "scientific studies" concerning human head lice basically "study" the "effectiveness" of whatever this or that poison we could potentially smother our heads in to kill these critters.  It shouldn't be this way.  I like to think of the lice comb as a magical "lice particle isolation tool", (kinda like how a centrifuge along with a syringe nano-filter is a magical "nano-particle isolation mechanism").

(Please consult your “doctor” before making any decisions concerning your kid's lice issues, and please allow me to remind you to never take any medical advice from an anonymous psychotic masked baby funded by Russian billionaires who want to make antivaxxers look stupid...or something).

I’m reminded of one of the lousiest arguments the Germ Believers attempt to use against the Virus Deniers: (That we’re trying to somehow “discredit” all antivaxxers by making them look nutty…or something).

LICE AREN’T REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!

(let’s just pretend for one second….)

The most important Boostershots article is “Virus Denialism for Beginners.” We’re extremely grateful for everyone who’s ever read, liked, shared, commented, criticized, made fun of us, etc. We’re diligently working on the 3rd edition, but there’s been a lot of holiday procrastination alcoholism which has slowed us down more than expected.

But let’s just pretend that in the new upcoming 3rd edition, Jon Rappaport gets crossed out from the top 10 list in order to be replaced with a new “LICE AREN’T REAL” category. Now the “Unicorn Section of the Animal Kingdom” includes unicorns, viruses, AND LICE! What if Boostershots passionately wrote something along the lines of this:

“No one’s ever isolated a “louse”…EVER! All of those “lice” unicorn pictures are CGI’d! (Or they’re just a fuzzy picture of a tic or a mite or a roach nymph!) Lice don’t exist! “Lice” in reality is simply a mental condition that some children have which makes them “believe” that these microscopic bugs are crawling all over them! People who succumb to the FEAR of imaginary “lice” end up scratching their heads in a panic until they get red bumps everywhere, (which they then wrongly claim are “bites” from some imaginary lice monster!) Parents are too busy and too trusting of the medical establishment Club Satan to ever look into this! Lousy Lice Lobbyists are paying off the CDC with billions in order to sell the unsuspecting public MORE POSION!!!!”

Let’s say I really did write all of that, (while also continuing to produce all of our other regular “virus-denying” content at the same time).

What would the community of free thinkers who are actively questioning the bullshit virus narrative think?

What would the leaders of Team No Virus think?

Would all of the “Virus Deniers” start losing their minds?

Would Boostershots be ignored, ridiculed, scolded, or told to “STFU”?

Would we be derided as “Lice Deniers”?

Would Team No Virus demand to know Boostershots’ real identity?

Would Team No Virus worry that we might start influencing other parents and children to NOT treat a lice infestation with persistent grooming by using a lice comb FDA approved chemical Poisons?

Would Team No Virus have one of their people write up a lousy news article claiming that “Boostershots” is the “coordinating psy-op” of the “Lice Don’t Exist Movement” which was solely fabricated in order to diminish Team No Virus’s own logical analyses and to make them look extra “nutty” for all the new noobs and normies out there who are searching for the truth?”

Would Team No Virus demand censorship of the Boostershots blog if we were to claim that “Lice Don’t Exist”?

I honestly don’t think any of those things would happen. Do you? Team No Virus ain’t like that. Team No Virus is openminded, rational, reasonable, and objective. Even if Boostershots had 30 million viewers instead of 30 viewers….I still really don’t see this as a possibility. If Boostershots had a massive following, (which it doesn’t), then I could imagine someone like Dr Tom Cowan or Dr Sam Bailey say something like,

“That Boostershots blog initially had some interesting ideas about what we’re dealing with, but then they got a little weird once they disclosed that “Viruses AND Lice Don’t Exist.” Boostershots claims to love the Scientific Method and the Burden of Proof, so it seems really strange that they’d have this sudden change in mentality, because there are repeatable experiments that easily prove the existence of lice! Entomologists don’t make up lousy excuses like virologists do for not being able to find lice. However, none of this really matters because so many more people are starting to see the truth about the fraud of Germ Theory regardless of this strange Boostershots lice thing. Maybe that guy should start his own “No Lice Challenge” which has the same basic conditions that we’re asking for in our “No Virus Challenge”. We wish him all the best. There’s always a few weirdos in every great truth movement.”

PART 2:

HOW “SCIENCE” DEALS WITH LICE.

Surely the small number of bug nerds who actually study the “felicola subrostratus” would be mostly removed from the medical establishment's Club Satan’s war against the Scientific Method...right?  

Think about it for a few seconds…how much money or opportunity is there for any entomologist to study the spread of cat lice to begin with? Who’s going to pay these nerds, and more importantly, what does the customer want from these nerds?

I searched the internet far and wide to find a good cat lice study which clearly documented the pathogenic/contagious nature of the transmission of these "germs” critters", but I ran into an unexpected wall.  It was really disappointing to skim through a lot of these “scientific lice studies” only to find the same powerful grip of control from the medical establishment. But it's not all bad. 

Let's first take a brief look at some of the good things and the bad things from this particular unscientific Australian Study of Dog and Cat Lice.

Wait, unscientific? 

CORRECT.  I'm choosing to highlight this first "study" from Australia "Aus-jail-ya" in order to reveal the heavy hand of the germ theory as well as the utter failure to adhere to the Scientific Method, The Burden of Proof, and Koch's Postulates. 

(I took the liberty to fix the title in order to make the study a little more...scientific).

These 25 scientists started off in the right direction.   They isolated a bunch of lice and some other ectoparasites from other people's pet cats and dogs.  AND! They didn't just isolate a little piece of a louse, they got the whole damn organism, something that virologists NEVER DO.  How did they do this?   

Ok, so these scientists carefully picked out these bugs from the cat fur and then looked at them under a microscope to discern which bug was which, (based off other identical whole entire bugs which are found and known in nature.)  Then they took a really dope picture! (Again, virologists never do anything like this).  

Great start scientists!  Isolation success! Photography Success!  Entomologists 2!  Virologists 0!  (Notice the distinctive triangle head which is specific for cat lice.)

Then the scientists did some "molecular identification" of the ectoparasites. 

"We selected individual lice and mites under an optical microscope and extracted gDNA by using a QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (QIAGEN)." 

Ok, whatever.  So the scientists extracted some cat lice DNA to compare with data from other scientists who also extracted cat lice DNA from the same whole intact species.  (At least they isolated the entire organism before this step).  And again, virologists never do this.  

The “scientific language” used throughout the study is dripping with unscientific agenda promotion, specifically the agenda to empower "the authorities" ability to increase pest control measures and to justify more government spending.  Koch's Postulates, The Scientific Method, And the Burden of Proof are all going to get trashed! 

Did these scientists ever verify that they could take one of these isolated cat louses and then transfer it to a new different healthy cat with no lice previously in order to PROVE that the cat louse IS indeed capable of a parasitically infecting in a new healthy specimen? 

NO.  The only final "results"obtained from the study were the successful identification, photography, and some DNA extraction of a bunch of bugs collected from 1,229 dogs and 1,152 cats from various pet owners living in random areas throughout all of South East Asia.  That's all these 25 scientists did!  The parasitic and contagious transmission of the cat lice itself is simply taken for granted on a base level for the whole study. 

Let’s give the scientists some slack, as “lice transmission” isn’t the main focus of the study. The “germ” within the “germ” is their primary focus, as is the case in most of these lice studies unfortunately. Now let's get to the bad part.

Here come the unsubstantiated claims masquerading as scientific fact, (paid for by the Australian tax payers):

And how exactly do they just know all of this? Does the word "avian" refer to flying unicorns? 

NO. They didn’t “investigate” shit. They just collected a bunch of bugs from dogs and cats and then took some pictures. They get credit for that part. But then they claim that they found some special “cat virus” in some of the cat lice. Oh Really? And how exactly did they “find” this “virus” that’s inside this bug?

They didn’t find, isolate, or “detect” any “cat viruses”. They claim that they “detected” some “antigens” and “antibodies”…so of course that MUST mean there’s definitely a cat virus too! Sure bro. There’s another 2 pages of “PCR mumbo jumbo” attempting to justify this bullshit). 

Chill bro, if you’ve got the same reality-twisting-logic capabilities of a virologist…then the world is yours!

It’s kinda like…

”Scientists recently isolated 6 apartment complexes in South East Asia. All of these fully intact apartment complexes were photographed and had various architectural measurements taken during the scientific study. Using an aliquot of individual apartments found within each apartment complex, scientists detected numerous empty vodka bottles and 1/2 eaten jars of pickled herring which confirm the presence of the extremely virulent and toxic novel boostershotticus homoalcohollicus authors viruses. It is already well understood in the scientific community that apartment complexes on can be dangerous vectors of Boostershots authors.” 

IF there’s really a bunch of deadly cat viruses hiding inside this poor louse, then why didn’t the entomologists virologists just isolate one of them? Did they do an experiment trying to infect other cats with the same deadly virus that’s inside the dangerous “vector louse” that they found? Nope! They could easily isolate the whole louse, but for some reason they can’t isolate one of those “whole viruses” that’s partying real hard inside Club Cat-Louse? Are these 25 scientists really just a bunch of “virologists” pretending to be entomologists? Or is it the other way around? 

What’s the final “conclusion” after all of this nonsense?

This “conclusion” is already stated in their opening statement anyway. So I guess they “found” the “conclusion” that they were looking for!

These 25 scientists are supposed to be lice experts right? Do they not realize that lice are specific to the host they infect? How could a cat louse transmit a virus to a human even if it wasn’t imaginary to begin with?

Kill me.

The study basically endorses more government power and more "science" money stolen from taxpayers as the “solution to all of their unsupported bullshit results claims. Just because 25 scientists found a bunch of cat lice and some other bugs on people's pets doesn't mean that those same bugs are “likely” transferring "viruses" to humans…because PCR dawg!  FUCK NO. 

There has to be a proper “cause and effect” experiment using proper control groups in order to directly prove or not prove if this “bug to human” phenomena is really true. 

But hey, at least these scientists isolated the actual “germ” thing which they are unscientifically blaming for the cause of a "problem" that also requires an expensive solution!  These Australian bug nerds are still 2 steps ahead of the virologists unicornologists at least!

Sadly, if these types of “scientific conclusions” don’t get regularly written and dispersed to the public at large, then those juicy government paychecks won’t get regularly justified and dispersed to the “scientists” who write them.

So what would a good scientific study actually look like if “virologists” really adhered to the Scientific Method in order to PROVE the contagious nature of their beloved lucrative "viruses"? 

PART 3: HOW BETTER “SCIENCE” DEALS WITH LICE

While I was truly optimistic that I'd find at least one “scientific study” which happens to prove the "contagiousness" of cat lice during my initial research, I had to switch animals in order to find something really meaningful and removed from the influence of the powerful medical establishment Club Satan....well, at least somewhat removed.)

That “el gato mallophaga” title picture ain't no cat! 

It's a Microcebus rufus who's been infected with the Lemurpediculus verruculosus! 

(That’s Fancy Feast science language for “like a lemur with lemur lice”).

If I were a 7th grade Life Science teacher, then I'd use this Lemur Lice Study to demonstrate the strict adherence to the Scientific Method in order to prove the "contagiousness" of something.

However, I must first disclose that this 2nd study still makes a few unsubstantiated claims that lemur lice can transmit viruses to their hosts, and I hate that. References were provided which purport to substantiate those limited claims, but having briefly looked into those, I've only got more doubts and more questions…as always.  I really just wish those few brief claims were simply left out, because the imaginary “germ” inside the REAL “germ” is NOT the primary focus of this much better lice germ study!

How could I really blame any of these entomologists when all of these studies are almost always funded by governments with an agenda? A lot of anti-vaxxers and virus deniers alike have had their funding sources cut off just for speaking their minds. Every field of “Science” has this same exact problem.

The study’s PRIMARY FOCUS is strictly concerning the “contagiousness” of the lemur lice itself…exactly what I was searching for originally.

This is the kind of study that "virologists" SHOULD do with “viruses” but they refuse to do at all costs.

The writing style of this study is so much clearer and explanatory than the previous one we referenced. There’s no purposely inserted overly complex science jargon attempting obfuscate some PCR process that they could misuse to claim the existence of unicorns living inside a lemur louse.

So just imagine if the Virus Pushers actually wrote a similar type of abstract which delves into the specifics of the contagious transmission of “viruses” instead of the contagious transmission of lemur lice. Believe me bro, I’ve scoured the internet for a “virus” research study just like this one, but IT DOES NOT EXIST.

Just imagine if virologists were able to "track" individual "viruses" in a similar manner with the same precision that these entomologists tracked each lemur louse’s “journey” from lemur to lemur:

Here's how they did the tracking:

Wow, these scientists entomologists are using the Scientific Method to figure out how the contagious transmission of lemur lice from host to host actually happens!

Ok ok OK! So you might be thinking something along the lines of, 

"Bro, SIZE DOES MATTER!  Scientists can do this type of germ-tracking strictly because the louse is 15,000 times bigger than a virus!  How the fuck do you expect them to track something that's only 100nm wide! Go to hell!"

We've got this covered bro girl.

You’ve made it all the way to the end of Part 3!

So are you ready to zoom in with me…

to A Whole New World?

Let’s take a little Magic Carpet Ride to down to The Edge of the Deep Green Sea!

Our new Boostershots Bioluminescence Research Division has just developed a brand new unlicensed technology which effectively "stains" all Covid19 viruses with a very distinct "Poison-Neon-Green" nano-marker. Additionally, our new Boostershots Super-Optics Factory has just invented a new and improved version of the Royal Raymond Rife microscope which grants us the ability to "zoom in" and "refocus" on any tiny object that's been targeted, (and with a resolution that's never been seen before)....until now. For the first time in human history, we’re going to observe the nucleus of a Covaids Virus!

The 25 Australian scientists from that first lousy cat study that we cited were generous enough to provide Boostershots with one of their original sample specimens for us to re-examine in our own lab. Attention Animal Lovers! Please rest assured that we found a good home for this lab-cat after we got what we needed from him.

We isolated the last remaining nit on this cat’s fur so we could lock onto our target specimen using our new technology. (A nit is a louse egg that sticks to the fur)

Notice the the scale bar down at the bottom right corner. That thin green line represents 1/10th of a millimeter. So if we lined up 1000 “Covid19 viruses” next to each other in a single file row, then they should all fit “purrfectly” into this thin green line.

Let’s keep zooming!

There’s a little black dot inside this egg. What is it? Let’s keep zooming to find out.

Well whadaya know! This tiny little black dot just so happens to be almost exactly 7500 nano meters in diameter! (Please notice our new thin green scale bar line). And! 7500 nano meters also happens to be the exact same size that a human red blood cell is! We’ve superimposed one of the highest resolution photos available of a living red blood cell as a reference guild, so everything is exactly to scale, as it should be. (This reference red blood cell photo is a screen shot from an amazing Youtube video from Sci- Ispi) We’ve really gotta get this dude on Team No Virus!

Here’s another quick screenshot of the whole frame from Sci- Inspi’s video at the x1500 microscopic power level. I’ve searched the internet far and wide to find the best “zoomed in” highest resolution video of living red blood cells in real time, and I can’t find anything as good as this.

Ya know, these living “red blood cells” sure do look at lot more pinkish clear than they look “red”…

So WTF is a human “red” blood cell doing in that cat louse egg!!??!!?!?!?

Just Kidding! We honestly have no idea what this little black speck could be! Team No Virus would never approve of Boostershots jumping to this conclusion solely based off one bit of size-correlation “evidence” that we “discovered”. Is it possible that our new Boostershots “scientists” were sorta “looking” for any indiscernible “speck” which we could find that also directly correlates to the exact same size of a human red blood cell? (Kinda like how when virologists find a little piece of information with their PCR bullshit in order to claim that their little black dot little fragment of a genetic sequence MUST be evidence of an entire virus they invented?) Whatever.

Let’s zoom in some more!

Now we’re really in there! We’re already breaking the limits of what modern optical technology can handle! Our little black dot of interest and our reference red blood cell are both really starting to look out-of-focus-ish…

Have you noticed our new poison-neon-green particle staining technology yet? How could you not notice?! You’re witnessing optical virus isolation in real time for the first time in all of human history!

Wait a minute…why does that reference red blood cell also have 3 distinct neon-poison-green stained virus particles?

Well, that’s because our old Boostershots Ninja Division previously infiltrated the Sci-Inspi home laboratory and they managed to secretly poison this dude with our new prototype nano-marking test serum. Looks like it worked! Damn…these little Covid19 viruses are everywhere! Hopefully that Youtuber is asymptomatic!

We’re still not done zooming!

Now we’ve zoomed in deep enough to just barely see the nucleus of the Covaids Virus! More history in the making!

“Keep Zooming!!!!”

OK!

We’re almost at The Edge of the Deep Green Sea! Who would have thought that the Covid19 virus is more of a “squarish” shape instead of that sticky-ball-dog-toy shape we’ve all been mind-controlled with over the last 3 years!

“DON’T STOP ZOOMING!!!!”

I’m NOT STOPPING until we reach the edge! We’re almost there!

We made it to the edge! The Covid19 Nucleus has been official isolated! Now it’s time to use our new Boostershots unlicensed re-focussing technology! (Well, it’s not really our technology…)

We just stole it from Law and Order SVU! (All the other “variants” of TV crime dramas also use this special type re-focussing technology as well…it’s standard TV crime drama magic). There are many instances where the “good TV cops” who are trying to catch the “bad TV criminals” have to rely on crappy surveillance footage which looks really blurry and out-of-focus. But then the special “computer dork character” just “digitally enhances” the shitty footage so they can find out who the bad guy is!

When I was just a child who was too young to be watching these types of shows, I was always amazed and wondered if this “digital enhancement” trick was really possible…I used to think to myself, can we really do this in real life???

The answer is YES WE CAN!

FUck! We put the slide under the microscope upside down! We shouldn’t have been drinking and driving on this Magic Carpet Ride. Whatever!

Behold! Here is the first crystal clear image of a real healthy “alive but not really alive” upside-down Covid19 Virus!

“You mean to tell me all of that zooming was actually...”

And this Magic Carpet Ride is over…

Lessoned learned. Curiosity is kills the cat! Never Drink and Drive while operating your Magic Carpet. It’s a toxic mixture which only leads to certain doom.

Alright alight alright!  So we don't really have any of this "technology" just yet, and that sucks, because “finding a virus” would really would be THIS simple if we could actually do this. 

In reality, Boostershots still has the same lame-ass technology and methods that the Virus Worshipers have at their disposal: shitty microscopes, shitty excuses, and a bunch of fake CGI images.  But at least our fake-ass green-stained Covid viruses are to actually to scale! 

So now we're right back to:

"Bro, SIZE FUCKING MATTERS!  Scientists can do this type of “lemur-lice-germ-tracking” strictly because it’s 15,000 times bigger than a freakin’ virus!  How do you expect them to track something with something that's only 100nm wide!"

And that's where Koch returns to back into the foray.  

This is why the Germ Believers hate Koch so much:

Lice can be isolated.  Then those same isolated lice can be used to grow more new lice on a "pure culture", (meaning, another lemur, or another cat, or another human, or another whatever else you're studying...  but why is this step even necessary? Why not just transfer the same lice germ from the original host?)

More on that to follow shortly…

Newly “cultured” lice can be transferred to another healthy host and the same lousy effects that this germ causes can be easily documented, repeatably and predictably.  

We can't see the hCG molecule which is only about 2.5 nanometers long….

We also can't "grow" new hCGs in a separate pure culture.  But we can certainly isolate these hormones and introduce them into another "host", and then we can observe the same effects of hCG on that ‘host” repeatably and predictably.  (hCG is the hormone that women begin producing in large quantities after becoming pregnant which thickens the uterine lining to support a growing embryo and tells the body to stop menstruation). 

We can't see the helium atom, which is only around 0.028 nanometers wide. 

We also can't "grow" new helium atoms in a new separate pure culture.  But we can certainly isolate these helium particles and then introduce them into another "host" organism and observe the same effects that helium does to the “host” repeatably and predictably.

We can't see mustard gas, caffeine, or nitros oxide either...

So let's do one final experiment before we criticize Koch.  Yeah, we're really gonna have to do that...but first let’s get this 45 second “quicky” finished before the parents get back home from work.

6 groups of 100 cats each!  Each cat gets a balloon filled with a surprise gas!  Double Blind Gold Standards Galore!  All "balloon givers" and all "ballon receivers" will have no clue what gas is in what ballon!

Steve Kirsh will pay $200,000 to any cat who can correctly guess which gas they JUST inhaled…(if they live). This final cat experiment “No Gas Challenge” is based off the same exact concept of the “No Virus Challenge” which all of the Germ Believers are desperately trying to make go away. IT’S NEVER GOING AWAY.

Ridiculously simple experiments like this make the Germ Believers go bonkers.  It's why they hate Koch so much.

More and more truth seekers are really starting see this glaringly obvious issue, and we're seeing a lot more pushback lately which is a really great thing:

Well said ShiYen.

PART 4: CONCLUSION: 

Perhaps some of the haters Virus Worshipers out there assume that everyone at Club Boostershots are just a bunch of mindless mind-controlled “Koch Worshipers” living downstairs in mom’s basement. 

It would be a lot more accurate to “deride” us as “Logic Worshipers” instead. Our defense of Koch is really just a defense of cause and effect logical reasoning which must be strictly applied to all scientific hypothesis testing before claiming that something is proven. This logical concept is also known as causality. The inverse of this concept is the False Cause and False Attribution Logical Fallacy:

So here's my own Koch criticism, (which is very different from the Virus Pusher's huge Koch problems they’ve got going on in all of their “experiments”). 

The 2nd 1/2 of the 2nd Step of Koch’s Postulates is:

“…and grow it in a pure culture."

I've really tried to wrap my head around WHY the Koch Postulates include this extra requirement, because this seems counterintuitive, as the optimum "pure culture" that any and all "germs", (both real and imaginary), logically prefer to GROW on/in IS the actual host itself!  (And that’s whether these germs are eating you directly, (as in the cat louse), OR if these “germs” are really just squatters inside your body who are eating all of the delicious Pot Roast you so kindly invited them to join!) 

Pot roast? 

Let’s say you’d like to be the “Host” of this “Pot Roast” dinner party. You’re going to need to prepare some of your tissue to deprive of oxygen “roast” in order to make this delicious meal for your wonderful guests that you’ve so kindly invited. Professor Clostridium Perfringens along with Mr and Mrs Lysinibacillus Fusiformis are really nice people. They would never think to do something really “germy” like “breaking in to your house and killing your sleeping family just to raid your refrigerator and smoke all your weed.” This is not to say that these horrific tragedies don’t happen. Dr Remdesivir is also a real person, and well known serial killer, but he often gets away with these kinds of murders because his corrupt lawyers keep rigging the juries with Germ Believers who are always counted on to place the blame on some imaginary “virus”, and what’s even more troubling is that nice people like Professor Clostridium Perfringens and Mr and Mrs Lysinibacillus Fusiformis will often get blamed for extremely violent crimes that they didn’t commit. 

Professor Clostridium Perfringens and Mr and Mrs Lysinibacillus Fusiformis are real people, not imaginary people, like “Colonel Mustard Covid”. These pot-roast-loving people are very proper and polite for the most part, and they’ll never show up to a pot roast party unless the host invites them first. 

However, they’re also pot roast addicts, so if you cook a huge pot roast that stinks up the whole neighborhood and if you also leave the front door of your house wide open, then Professor Clostridium Perfringens and Mr and Mrs Lysinibacillus Fusiformis won’t be able to help themselves!! 

And just like any addict would, they’ll justify the fanatic consumption of your Fancy Feast as a free dinner invitation that was all your idea. 

(This is Fancy Feast science language which means…like a Gangrene Dinner Party!)

Look, if I left a pound of weed on the sidewalk in front of my house in the hood of the real Boostershots…with a little sign on it that says, “Please Don’t Smoke Me!”…. 

Whatever.

So do “germs” really “want” to kill you? 

Do “germs” even “want” to harm you? 

Are “germs” really just rowdy teenagers from the 80s who like to party in person and raid your fridge? (They’ll also end up make a huge mess and never think to flush the toilet either!)

Or are “germs” more like pot roast addicts looking for a free “pure culture medium” to feast on? 

Maybe it’s a little bit of both.

The “pure” host organism itself IS “The Culture Club”. 

Whether this "pure culture club" is the living scalp on your head, or the crevasses of your sweaty toes, (in the case of athlete's foot), "germs" always “grow” best in the same habitat which provides them with the right components needed for reproduction, as do all living things. 

So why do we need to grow lice, (or grow any suspected “germ” for that matter), in a separate “pure culture" before we transfer it to another healthy host Culture Club in order to prove the contagious transmission of something before we transfer it to another healthy host?

Is the 2nd Step of Koch's Postulates just some weird "monkey wrench" thrown in to this foray that essentially distorts the TIMELESS and basic logical concept of "Cause and Effect"? 

Do Koch's Postulates require some de-transition surgery after all?  

Look, I'm still an unlicensed doctor, but I do have access to Igor Chudov's new red fountain pen! As you may be already well aware, the "United States" is still operating under a declared state of "emergency",  so let's just go full steam ahead with this "Emergency Use Authorized Operation" on Koch's Postulates! 

Have we successfully "de-transitioned" Koch's Postulates back into the timeless basic logical concept of Cause and Effect?  Or is this more like a "redefining"? 

Whatever. We’re finally at the end of this song that’s been way too long to handle. 

But there’s still just one more thing….something even more important troublesome mysterious weird that I still haven't gotten into yet.  As I was writing/researching this "lousy" Boostershots post, I happened to run across this article from Microbe Magazine in 2006.

This well written article discusses the basic origins of the Koch Postulates and the medical/science history of that time. There’s nothing really edgy or controversial, the article is a seemingly benign and informative nerdy essay about Robert Koch that would suit the Encyclopedia Brittainia perhaps. 

But then I noticed this Koch picture for the first time ever...

Just saying bro...

The author of the article, D. Jay Grimes, offers no additional information regarding this particular photograph of Koch that he chose to display within the body of his text, and it really appears as though it was only harmlessly included as a basic biographical reference picture of Koch and his assistant, Loeffler, and nothing more. 

Wikipedia makes no mentions of any "Koch Free Mason" connections, and a simple DuckDuckGoogle search also yields no results.   Perhaps some historians have delved into this but I couldn’t find anything.

Regardless, my sudden discovery of the “Hidden Hand Of Koch” made me go straight for the whiskey bottle. 

Maybe Robert’s right hand got a little cold when he was posing for that photo?

Or maybe he got a bad temporary hand tattoo and was little embarrassed?

Then I had to blast some Alanis Morrisette with the volume turned up to 11.  Her 2nd hit single got stuck in my head for some reason…

Alanis Morrisette?

The Canadian pop singer from the 90s? But this is an 80s Cat Album! What the hell is she doing here?

You don’t remember Alanis from the 80s do you. I can’t blame you for that unless you’re Canadian I suppose.

That “green slime” is actually our new Boostershots unlicensed “Poison-Neon-Green Nano-marking serum”. (It also kills lice). We’ve been working on that secret formula for almost 40 years! We used to test it on all of these lab-kids way back in the 80s when you could still get away with shit like this. You Can’t Do That on Television would probably be cancelled by the Cancel Culture Club if it was aired in 2020 and beyond. 

We miss the 80s.

And we miss the 90s too.

So what does 90s Alanis Morissette actually mean when she's singing:

What's to be concluded from this previously unseen Koch photo?  

We're not getting involved.

Boostershots is on a mission to save the world from germ theory, not to get into the vast amount of other strange "conspiracy" stuff that's out there.  

We’re staying focussed on germs.

Hold up, the telephone is ringing…

Damn.

So I’ve just been informed by the new Boostershots Historical Research Division that Joseph Stalin, Napoleon, AND Heinrich Herman Robert Koch were all BITTEN on their right hands by their bad cats…(right before they had those paintings made and that photograph taken). Who that knew these 3 dudes were all cat people?

Now it all makes sense!

Everything’s Gonna Be Fine Fine Fine!