Talk Dirtier To Me

The Right To Bear Words

WARNING: EXPLICIT LANGUAGE UP AHEAD.  HIDE THE KIDS.  HIDE THE GRANDPARENTS.  HIDE THE CAT.

The right to bear words:

The obligation to bear words:

The right to bear words:

The obligation to bear words:

Diana West really gets it...

The freedom of speech and "Team No-Virus" are inextricably linked.

Have we been successfully mind-controlled with Monky Science?

Or did our Boostershots Pro Bono Legal Division ensnare a new learning opportunity for the truth community?  

Let's find out!

Check out this response to a recent article we published on 06/25/23 which was titled, "Nothin' But a Good Time". 

Ya know, he's gotta really good point! 

He nailed it.  

Monky Science has revealed the central theme of "Talk Dirtier to Me" that we already had in mind.  

However, Monky Science missed the "fine print"!  

(Before initiating any "legal logic dispute", one must carefully review any disclaimers that might hurt the logic which is supporting one's argument, especially if you intend to take the matter to "COURT").    

As lawyers often are, we must admit that our Boostershots Legal Division was purposely vague and sneaky about revealing our true intentions within this little "disclaimer", but it wouldn't be called "the fine print" if it wasn't purposefully vague and sneaky deceptive to begin with!  

The key word is vision.

"Vision" pertains to our "ideal" reality, not necessarily our exact reality...unfortunately...

Regarding the little phase within our own "Team No-Virus Proclamation":

"...who are anti-censorship..."... 

This rightfully deserves SOME criticism.  We knew this when we wrote it.

The heart of Monky Science's argument has rock-solid merit because of documented evidence.  Alec Zeck has admitted in writing that Monky Science was banned on his platform.  However, despite this admission, we were not able to see the actual content which was "banned" in the first place.  

We'll also be discussing the OTHER very important instance of this same issue, (which almost made me jump out the window upon first discovering it a few months ago...but more on that later).  

There's no doubt that Monky Science swiftly discovered the "weak-point" of our latest article, and he's mutilating it.  

But can you blame him?

The main objective of "Talk Dirtier to Me" is to create more awareness and offer simple solutions which will overcome our only REAL self-inflicted WEAKNESS:  

There is a small amount of censorship within our own "team".  

Yes.  (And you know this...you're reading Boostershots).

We're going to constructively criticize Team No-Virus, because I want us to better understand and avoid these rare "problems" in the future.  

We must retain the growing amount of strength and positive energy we have already generated, therefore, we cannot simply "ignore" these errors.  We must confront them directly, correct them, and move forward in a productive way.

An error is NOT a mistake.

However, an error WILL become a mistake, if we do not learn from it.  

Over-heated debate within the truth community is not the "problem".  

Intense disagreement within the truth community is not the "problem". 

Snark, misdirection, name-calling, or even false accusations ARE NOT THE "PROBLEM".  (However, those ARE very unfortunate circumstances.)

CENSORSHIP within the Truth Community IS the ONLY "PROBLEM".  

So we're giving full credit to Monky Science for nailing it...but we're also gonna have to make him eat some of his own nails!

Don't despair. 

Team No-Virus' continued expansion of positive energy WILL prevail by the end of this post, and everyone's gonna be alright once we get to the finish line.  

Stay with me.

Dr Robert Sniadach already gets it, therefore, no further reading is necessary for him:

Damn Bro...close your laptop and have a margarita! 

Before we get into our dinner's main course, let's eat the appetizer first.

The key word that's being misused is "dualism".  

This word is very misleading because it implies that an equal amount of "censorship" is being "used" by Team No-Virus when compared to the Germ Believers.  

I don't see any evidence of this "censorship dualism"...  Do you?  

The use of censorship is blatantly more employed against the people who support the no-virus position.  (Who else wants to get kicked out of Sasha Latypova's Band Band Wagon!)

Call me biased, but according to our own extensive observations, censorship is used about a zillion times more often by them when compared to us.  

Regardless, we still WISH it was a Zillion to ZERO.  That's our personal ideal vision.

We must also understand that the Germ Believers can over-exploit every instance of "censorship", (or even any perceived instance of censorship within the truth community), especially if it leads to any perceived "conflict" within "Team No-Virus" that they could point out, no matter how unfair or deceptive this portrayal might be.  

We really can't afford to give them any "ammunition".   

It's actually a blessing that a true "virus denier" like "Monky Science" is the first individual to really call us out to this extreme. 

I don't believe Monky Science is "controlled opposition" or a "psyop".  He doesn't have all of the "traits" that we talked about in our previous post.

This dude's got big brass balls, and he's certainly not afraid to speak his mind.  He's clearly human, which also means he makes errors mistakes.

Not a good look for you bro...

You're accusing Alec Zeck of the same exact kind of "censorship" which you believe you are a victim of!  

Need another example?

Alec Zeck has many thousands more comments on his platform as Monky Science does.  What percentage of those comments has Alec "banned" on his platforms in comparison to Monky Science's own platform?  

The Boostershots Historical Research Division has honestly not researched Alec Zeck's content as extensively as many of the other heavy-hitters of "Team No-Virus", simply because there is only so much time, and because we also happened to come across other individuals like Dr Tom Cowan and Dr Sam Bailey first.  

(We also don't use Telegram, as they require a "phone number" to participate.  Aside from "the internet"...Substack, Bitchute, and Odysee are our preferred platforms at the moment).  

Having briefly looked into Alec Zeck's content recently, we believe that he is genuine in his pursuit of truth, and we also believe he's an overall huge net-positive for creating new awareness of the no-virus position.  We support him wholeheartedly.

We're in full agreement with Mike Stone's assessment:

Let's review this brief exchange regarding Monky Science's "banishment" from Alec's Telegram.  

This doesn't play out well for Monky Science.  (But that's up to independent free thinkers to decide for themselves).  

Regardless, Alec still felt compelled to go "thermo-nuclear" and "vaporize" Monky Science, which was a mistake an error.

NOT GOOD BRO...

(Why do "nukes" exist?................  Whatever............)

While I think Alec's offer to do a video conference with Monky Science confirms a true intent to settle the matter, perhaps Alec's proposal could be construed as a nefarious attempt to unfairly pressure Monky into revealing his real identity, (especially if Monky's "job security" greatly depends on remaining anonymous, just as ours does).  But how could we know?

Perhaps Alec could have said: 

"Monky Science, I'm happy to do a video conference with you, but I also respect your right to privacy/anonymity, therefore, we can do an audio-only conference call on a secure private channel, and you can alter your voice if that makes you feel more comfortable.  I just want the public to hear our conversation so they can make their own informed judgement." 

However, the "conditions" that Monky Science is requiring before further engaging with Alec are totally unreasonable.  

The demand for an "apology" due to Alec's supposed "transgressions" are unsupported without providing documented evidence, (like screenshots of that actual exchange which led to the "banishment").  

Why not just include that "evidence" for the public to judge for themselves?  

And why would someone so bold as Monky Science even care about "swear words" and "F-bombs" to begin with?  Boostershots has probably dropped more "F-bombs" than any other No-Virus supporter on the net... 

Monky Science hasn't demanded "an apology" from Boostershots despite our ridiculous ludicrous overuse of shitty language?  (And he also feels very comfortable commenting here as well).  

Sounds like weak tea bro.  

Demanding for someone to "hold a civil discussion without your emotions getting in the way" is condescending, unless they are an AI robot...

Do you really not see your own "emotions" within your own unique and  passionate writing style, Monky Science?

Speaking of "emotions" and "passion", can we apply Monky Science's own logic to prove those two "things" even exist?  

I'm going to play "Devil's Advocate", (while also recognizing that Monky Science doesn't believe in the Devil, but I'm sure he understands the basic premise of this colloquial "phrase".)

Let's suppose that Monky Science is 100% correct:  

God does NOT exist, as we cannot "use the Scientific Method to test God's physical interaction with this reality".

What about love?  

What about empathy?  

What about "emotions"?

Monkey Science clearly stated that "emotions" do in fact exist.  

SO PROVE IT!

What about fairness? 

What about the reasons which compels Monky Science to expend his own mental energy to expose the truth as he sees it?

Why does Monky Science use FOIS to expose evil?  

(Is there any money in that?)

Why does Monky Science care about humanity?  

(Is there any money in that?)

Where does Monky's essence of caring come from?  

Why not just use that razor-sharp logic purely for your own self interest?  

Why not just "make" lots of babies and sell them to Club Satan selfish nihilistic rich people so you can live the "good life" and avoid toiling in a wage-slave job?

I KNOW Monky Science has empathy, especially for the other good natured humans whom he believes have been unfairly deceived.  

However, I can't prove Monky Science's empathy with the Scientific Method.  Can he?  Let's find out!

"Viruses" are fraudulently claimed to exist in the physical world.  

Is empathy Are emotions "fraudulently" claimed to exist in the physical world also?  

Why are you claiming that "emotions" exist?

I've chosen to keep my identity and my own "spiritual beliefs" private within this Boostershots blog.  (I'm trying at least).  That's just my choice.  

Alec Zeck, Peggy Hall, and Sam Bailey have each chosen to reveal their own personal identities as well as their own personal spiritual beliefs on their platforms, and I respect that. 

We all have that choice...we all have that inalienable right.

We all SHOULD have that choice...we all SHOULD have that inalienable right.

(BTW, where does the "SHOULD" come from?)  

The term "Club Satan" could certainly be used literally and genuinely by a person who truly believes in God, or it could be used by an adamant atheist who's just being cynical, or it could be used by someone who's still just trying to figure it all out...

So how's this objective approach:  We're not claiming whether or not God exists, we're just asking some questions about the origins of human "emotions".

More Devil's Advocate!

"Love is biochemically no different than consuming large quantities of chocolate."  OK great.  

There is no God.  Fine!

"God", "The Church", and the "Medical Establishment" are all compartmentalized control mechanisms that are intertwined within the umbrella of the Abrahamic Religion System. 

Got it!

Now let's briefly examine the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NEW ZEALAND, (our respective home "countries").

What percentage of the population's time, energy, and money is used to consume "God"?

What percentage of the population's time, energy, and money is used to consume "Church"?

What PERCENTAGE of the population's time, energy, and money is used to consume "vaccines", medications, health insurance, drug overdoses, drug rehab, birth control pills, abortion, chemotherapy, "psychotherapy", etc, etc, etc...

The humanity of these Western nations is already very close to "Godlessness" and "Churchlessness" as it is, especially when compared to how much time, energy, and money that's expended on the Medical Establishment's "Goodies".

Now let's examine Monky Science's Solutions to overcome the Abrahamic Religion System:

These "solutions" have already been adopted and realized for the most part in Western Civilization.  We're practically living in "HELL" already, (despite that "HELL" is just a contract “construct"... since we're still playing "devil's advocate"...RIGHT?). 

Most people in western nations already don't "listen" to any "religious leaders" or "religious songs"...

They "listen" to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Travis Scott.  Are those kinds of people any more likely to realize that germ theory is a fraud?  

The construct of "God" has already been successfully removed from younger generations for the most part, (and that's whether those younger individuals even believe in "God" or not).  

In today's current society, a significant portion of "lesser value" young men have zero chance of finding any woman to start their own family.  However, the top 20% 10% 5% 1% 0.001% of men can ruthlessly ludicrously "slay" multiple young women without having to offer any kind of "family" commitment whatsoever...and this "practice" is glorified in mainstream Abrahamic culture.  

So are those young people who embrace this "system" more likely to realize that germ theory is a fraud?  

Millions of "families" are being "systematically" destroyed by government Abrahamic incentivized no-fault divorce.  

Did the Abrahamic Religion System always destroy human families in this manner, or is this just a new protocol of theirs which was only recently initiated over the last century?  

Why now?  

Why not hundreds or thousands or years ago instead?

In the Abrahamic Religion System, where's most of the MONEY concentrated?  

Where's the trunk of the tree?

Humans DON'T HAVE "money" forcefully taken out of their paychecks to pay for churches and religious leaders...

Humans DO HAVE "money" forcefully taken out of their paychecks to "pay" for "Public Health".

So if you really want to chop down this "tree", then what's the best way to utilize our chainsaws?

Go to hell!

You're in hell dawg.  Deal with it.

We've permitted our Boostershots Editorial Division to go nuts on Monky Science's Solutions with the help of Igor Chuduv's "red crayon"...

But only after we paid these assholes with: 

six bottles of cheap Chinese Russian Vodka...

six packs of Camel unfiltered cigarettes... 

six jars of unexpired pickled herring...

We're getting totally sidetracked from the main theme of this article: 

There is a rare amount of censorship within our own community.  This needs to end.

I hate having to go here, but it's necessary.

We love and support Dr Sam Bailey.  We firmly believe that she's having a tremendous positive effect for raising awareness about our no-virus reality.  Rather than thinking of her as one of the "leaders" of Team No-Virus, we prefer to think of her as one of the many unique individuals who are currently "in the lead", just like Dr Tom Cowan, just like Peggy Hall, just like Alec Zech.  

"The lead" is available to anyone if they can "reach" it, including Monky Science.

When we first came across this article a few months ago, 

we cringed:

I'm banned from Sam Bailey's substack for 1000 years for pointing out that animal ag is a multibillion dollar industry and the biggest user of Pharma

I've read this Georgie&Donnys post a few times over, and I'm still not even sure what to think.  (The comment section is more telling).  While I strongly disagree with some of the ideas that Georgie&Donnys have, their blog is enlightening to read, (and that's in addition to many interesting comments which they have posted on other Substacks).

So was this act of censorship just a trivial instance of an independent moderator going a little overboard on Dr Sam Bailey's Odysee Channel?  

Was this just an error?  

Or was it a mistake?

Did another commenter unfairly report these two unique free-thinkers?  

Or is this just an Odysee "glitch"?  

Are there any other possible explanations which might somehow validate the use of censorship on Dr Sam Bailey's Odysee channel that we're unaware of?  

Given Sam Bailey's busy life, was she even aware that this even happened? 

Have Monky Science and Georgie&Donnys regained their ability to comment freely once again?  

Something's not making sense...Sam Bailey made a video which discusses her own censorship on Youtube!  This should be a major issue for her!  

The evil elites who control this world are desperately trying to push the idea that Dr Sam Bailey's content could essentially be viewed as "incitement to violence".  

The Medical Establishment wants to brainwash people into thinking that Sam's logical analysis "medical misinformation" might cause people to NOT take their "medications" which they are claim are absolutely necessary just to stay healthy alive).

The Medical Establishment Club Satan wants people to embrace twisted logic, and that will only lead to unwavering beliefs such as this:

I used to be a big fan of el gato malo way back when, but I was always disappointed from his illogical responses when any of his readers were challenging him on the no-virus position at the time.  I tried to stay positive, hoping that he'd eventually come around.  When I discovered that he censored Edgardo from his platform, I quickly began to lose ALL hope for the bad cat.  (Edgardo wrote a great article about censorship which influenced this blog).  

How can we expect other free thinkers to react if the same shit censorship happens to them?

Georgie&Donnys are passionate about Animal Rights.

Edgardo is passionate about the Mother of God.

Boostershots is passionate about Censorship.

Monky Science is passionate about Abrahamic Religion Revisionism.

Steve Falconer believes the Earth is flat.

So what?

Despite that everyone should have the right to moderate their own platforms however they see fit, we firmly believe that the Leaders of Team No-Virus the individuals who are in the lead have an obligation to bear words.

In the same way that this "No-Virus" Boostershots Blog probably has the highest usage of "F-Bombs", (which might be "offending" Monky Science), we are dedicated and committed to the having the highest tolerance of speech.

Our proposed solution to Alec and all of the rest of the heavy-hitters within the No-Virus camp is very straightforward:  

Don't censor unless it's really fucking warranted.  

Censorship must always be a last resort option. 

Has Alec just made an error?  

Or is he el gato malo a bad cat? 

We understand that the "threshold" level for "warranting censorship" might vary from person to person. No-profanity Policies are totally reasonable if that's your thing, (especially if your blog is geared towards children or an all-age audience).  

However, we're talking about blogs for grown-ups who are actively challenging the Medical Establishment.

Our objective is to get every no-virus supporter to increase their "censorship thresholds" to the highest degree possible for..ultimately to the pinnacle position of...

"So what?"

Unless it's blatant spam or explicit/sexually aggressive language, then I really don't see any reason to censor.  And should "banning" really be the only last resort option available for any given scenario, then the reasons for those "bans" should be clearly articulated with logic and hard evidence.

Otherwise, the victims of censorship will rightfully speak out, causing unwanted division on Team No-Virus. 

It's almost always better to ignore than to censor.  

What if Alec had simply stated something like this on his Telegram:

"Monky Science is making false accusations and he's persistently challenging my spiritual beliefs on a regular basis.  I believe this is counter-productive.  Our mission is to expose the fraud of germ theory to the general public.  While I understand that I have the right to moderate my comment sections in any fashion of my choosing, (just as Monky Science does on his own platform), I'm still choosing to allow Monky Science to continue posting his own information on my platform, even if that means he might inspire other new free thinkers to research his angle.  I just prefer to not engage with him right now, but he can still say whatever he wants."

Here's our mini Sam Bailey Fantasy:

(Alternate version)

We've also witnessed a small number of rare exchanges in the comment sections of Substack which include statements along the lines of... 

"Keep this kind of talk up and you'll be banned!"

Statements like that also make us CRINGE, (unless it's sexually aggressive comments or explicit language). These rare "Close Calls" are also worrying.   

The Truth always speaks for itself, so if someone's really poppin' off in your comment section, then you'll always look better if you just allow it to happen while not letting it effect you.  Almost everyone of these types of situations could be handled by simply stating: 

"Stay mad!  Have a nice day!"  

Just let 'em blow themselves out of their own noodle!

Then ghost 'em in a cloud of kush.................

PART 2

Now that you're thoroughly baked, you're finally ready to handle some REAL ILL SHIT... 

WARNING:  (Seriously, if you're truly offended by explicit sexual language, then you should probably stop reading RIGHT NOW).

We're only bringing up Sarah Palin specifically to demonstrate that things could always be much worse.  No one on "Team No Virus" has been verbally attacked in the manner that Ms Palin has.  (At least not that we're aware of.) 

(We're staying completely neutral concerning Ms Palin's beliefs and politics).

Ms Palin could have simply said, "Stay mad, have a nice day", (and ghost)…

Ms Palin chose a different pathway to handle this unfortunate situation. So far so good all things considered…

Then Ms Palin ghosted her in a cloud of Kush...

"Rapper" response:

Then Ms Palin ghosted her in a cloud of Kush...

These tweets certainly aren't nice, but they're still a long way away from "harassment in the 2nd degree".

They're a really long way away from "defamation".

Despite that this "rapper's" language is ludicrously offensive, it's still just a sick and twisted hyperbolic fantasy.  These tweets do not constitute a "direction to inciting or producing  imminent lawless action” and “likely to incite or produce such action.”  

While of course we would never condone this horrific and abominable verbal assault, we must still concede that these are simply 18-and-over "tweets"...which are, and should, remain "lawful".  

This happened on a "public" forum, not Ms Palin's personal comment section, (which she would, and should, have the absolute right moderate, if she so chooses to). 

Ms Palin is also a public figure, and public figures have a much higher legal burden to overcome in order to prove a real speech violation, as it should be.  

From the viewpoint of a free speech absolutist, these "tweets" shouldn't be banned, so long as they remain in the "adults only section" of the internet...which is pretty much the whole internet.

However, Ms Palin's 2nd reaction was not "ghosting in a cloud of Kush"...(hence the strikethroughs) 

Sarah Palin is human, so I'm betting she had a quite a few restless sleepless nights which may have changed her just mind a few weeks later.  But how can you blame her?  

How would you react if this ever happened to you?   

Regardless, Ms Palin's 2nd reaction was a mistake forgivable error:

There's a very good reason that defamation requires such a high standard of proof in a free society.    

Please review this brief from one of our trusted untrusted attorney affiliates of the Boostershots Legal Division.  

(Team Boostershots spent $6,666.66 for these next few paragraphs, but it was totally worth it, and the last sentence was worth six grand all by itself....)

(I really wish I hadn't dropped out of law school).  

(BTW, Never trust a lawyer...never trust anyone in Night City.

Ms Palin didn't end up suing, and Ms Banks' tweets will age almost as badly as that pot-leaf tattoo you got in college NYU….

Now that we're still on the subject of defamation... 

(DELETED SCENCE #1) 

OK, since we just blew the entire budget on legal fees, our Boostershots Editorial Division has been forced to shorten the following 20,000 word passage about the adventures of Celia Farber down into just a couple of memes.  

(We're referencing an interesting series of articles she wrote over the last few months:  here, here, here, here, and here.)

How it Started....

How it's Going SIX WEEKS LATER:

More Defamation!

(DELETED SCENCE #2) 

Fuck!  Our Accounting Department pulled the plug on this one. 

(Is it just me, or are all accountants still Covid freaks?)

Another 20,000 word passage about Professor Mark Crispin Miller's "defamation" lawsuit against NYU must now be condensed into a couple of memes!  Why are lawyers so expensive?!

How it Started....

How it's going...

(If any readers happen to be NYU alumni, then please...go to hell)

(DELETED SCENCE #3) 

Whatever.  

So we got mind controlled by Monky Science, and we ran out of time, energy, and money.  He "took the lead" for the time being, just like anyone else can if they're able to make it happen.  

Now we're going to have to POSTPONE our unlicensed psychological forensic evaluation of a prominent licensed "psychologist" until a later time....  

The "psychologist" dodged another bullet...for now...

Conclusion:

We're not telling anyone what to do.  

We're just stating our vision.

As the positive strength and growth of Team No-Virus continues, we must not only be prepared, but we must expect an increasing number of intelligent and provocative free thinkers like Monky Science to jump into the foray and offer their own unique angles.

Censorship should NEVER be the go-to method employed to counter any ideas we disagree with, no matter how strange or offensive they might seem...even when debates become really overheated.

You can always ghost em' in a cloud of Kush!

Let the truth speak for itself.  

Let logic and reason speak for themselves.  

And if someone expresses an idea that we don't like, then...

so fucking what!

I love all of you Conspiracy Theorists Revisionists Cyberpunks who are actively and uniquely exposing the fraud of the germ theory to the rest of humanity!

Have a margarita beer!